Aluminium
#1
Posted 01 October 2004 - 08:21 PM
I see Labpak sell the coarse and fine variety and that 'Alec Tiranti' sells the atomised variety.
Could you also tell me whether it is more adviseable to use coarse or fine iron filings (or does it depend on what you're using the iron filings for?).
Thanks,
Greg
#2
Posted 01 October 2004 - 08:49 PM
Atomised powders are produced by forcing molten aluminium through an inert atmosphere, the result is a particle that is spherical in shape, and their size can be controlled precisely.
Flake powders are generally much more reactive owing to their increased relative surface area, and this makes them much more suited for use in fireworks applications. Flake aluminium is often used in the majority of flitter based effects, as well as in flash powders where extremely fine flake is used.
Atomised powders are less reactive, but still find use particularly in composite rocket motors and the popular glitter effect. When a type of aluminium is given in a particular formula, it is because the size and shape of the particles will produce certain desired characteristics. For example in flitter based effects you want bright long duration tails, so a medium-fine flake might be used. In a flash powder you want the composition to burn extremely quickly, so a very fine flake powder with a huge surface area is used.
In the glitter effect the atomised powders add to the delayed nature of the effect, as they do not react as readily with the air.
Granular aluminium is another kind, and is not very useful in fireworks.
With regard to iron fillings, or indeed any metal powder, the mesh size used is dictated by what you are trying to achieve. Long duration spark effects are suited to larger particles, while a much more fine and bushy effect can be achieved with finer particles. It is common to see a range of mesh sizes given in a formula, to improve the overall effect.
Hope this helps
#3
Posted 01 October 2004 - 09:41 PM
Do you know what type of aluminium powders are sold by organisations such as labpak (I assume that they are more likely to be atomised than flake).
Thanks again,
Greg
#4
Posted 01 October 2004 - 10:09 PM
#5
Posted 04 October 2004 - 11:02 AM
#6
Posted 04 October 2004 - 11:14 AM
#7
Posted 06 October 2004 - 01:55 PM
However, I've found their aluminium powder no good for pyro in any way, shape or form!!
Don't know if there is some form of inhibiter in it, but formulas made with it don't seem to burn....
thegreenman
#8
Posted 06 October 2004 - 02:18 PM
However, I've found their aluminium powder no good for pyro in any way, shape or form!!
No good at all? I have had success with Tiranti's Aluminium powder in 12mmID rockets when added to a slow burning BP comp. Also i found that it works good in stars along with great silver fountains.
#9
Posted 06 October 2004 - 02:29 PM
I've had no problem getting nice white sparks from Tiranti Al.
Flash made with it will not even begin to burn however - The particle size is FAR too large.
What effect are you trying to achieve?
#10
Posted 06 October 2004 - 02:44 PM
Just try a simple 80/20 bp/al formula you should get acceptable results.
#11
Posted 07 October 2004 - 08:28 PM
#12
Posted 08 October 2004 - 09:55 AM
A 80/20 mix of crys6/Al works very well in stars aswell, will post a video of a 3'' shell soon in the spherical shells thread.
#13
Posted 24 October 2004 - 10:46 AM
#14
Posted 24 October 2004 - 11:49 AM
Fine aluminium is extremely reactive - thats why we want it - so it is often coated during manufacture. Typical coatings include stearic acid - a hard wax - introduced during milling, and linseed oil - a drying oil - poured over the product, intimately mixed, and the surplus drained off, after milling. With Stearic acid a few percent by weight is added to the mill load, and milled together with the aluminium, the product can be screened and re-milled if appropriate. With the linseed oil the protective film is produced as the oil dries and hardens on the powder grains,and the grains may clump. The product may - due to clumping - give false results when screened, and CANNOT be re-milled without breaking the hardened coating..
All compositions depend for their effect on the particle sizes and size distribution. Some formulae only list ingredients by weight, others will have screen sizes for each component and a size distribution --- so much at 20 mesh and so much at 200 mesh. Reliable effects only occur when the variables are controlled.
True flake shaped particles (thin and flat) may have to be formed differently as milling tends to break flakes, passing through a very close set two roll mill to flatten out the spheroidal particles is an option probably while wet with linseed oil for lubrication and surface film formation. -- Carefull Two roll mills eat fingers unless very well protected.
Keep mannequins and watermelons away from fireworks..they always get hurt..
#15
Posted 19 November 2004 - 12:52 AM
Edited by broadsword, 19 November 2004 - 12:06 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users