Buying chemicals.
#376
Posted 15 June 2006 - 11:01 AM
#377
Posted 15 June 2006 - 01:13 PM
It is unfortunate that Chemistry has become a victim of all of this. It is of little suprise students loose interest in it these days, when it seems any even semi-impressive experiment / demonstration is banned under endless tirades of Health & Safety regulation. Where will it all end?
Across the pond things are getting much harder too. The CPSC is basically clamping down on the large chemical firms that supply all the smaller companies like Skylighter etc. Fireworks as a hobby is looking very bleak over there right now.
#378
Posted 18 June 2006 - 02:00 AM
There are a few things that are making things look up though. A recent article in Wired magazine portrays amateur chemistry in a positive light. There is becoming increased awareness of the issue. Many parts of the government wern't even aware what was going on. I personally feel it is a ploy to get their (CPSC) funding again. It expires and is up for renewal at the 1st of the year. "Oh look, we are fighting terrorism right here in the US". The reality is, there are 42 injuries caused my homemade fireworks a year in the US. You are 4x as as likely to injure yourself while writing a note with a pen or pencil.
#379
Posted 18 June 2006 - 10:58 PM
Mumble ? I think that is a very strange way to compare things. A cut from paper or pen is not likely to cause any serious harm, and there are a few more people using paper and pen then people who do pyrotechnic. I think ?comparing? any two fields will get you nowhere. Claiming that the grass is rotten somewhere else does not make yours look better.Indeed. This are not looking well. Amateur rocketry is in the same boat we are. If we go down, they go down. There are two main bulk suppliers here in the US. One has stopped serving resellers of chemicals. There is still one remaining though. I still have a couple years before I can be licenced anyway, so I plan to do some stock piling to tide me over.
There are a few things that are making things look up though. A recent article in Wired magazine portrays amateur chemistry in a positive light. There is becoming increased awareness of the issue. Many parts of the government wern't even aware what was going on. I personally feel it is a ploy to get their (CPSC) funding again. It expires and is up for renewal at the 1st of the year. "Oh look, we are fighting terrorism right here in the US". The reality is, there are 42 injuries caused my homemade fireworks a year in the US. You are 4x as as likely to injure yourself while writing a note with a pen or pencil.
?42? is a large number if you have 100 people doing something. It?s better focus on the statistics that are specific to your field if you want to prove a point to anyone.
Allot of what happens to suppliers over here has to do with the ?climate? of things. It also has to do with the way people call in and ask questions. If you call and sound like you try to hide something ? and if you get too many of those phone calls, you decide not to bother. Don?t forget ? making homemade fireworks in the UK, in quantities above 100g ? is ILLIGAL ? unless you have access to a properly licensed factory.
#380
Posted 19 June 2006 - 12:54 AM
#381
Posted 19 June 2006 - 11:02 AM
lost vision in that eye for years but now with time and a lens replacement i can almost read a news paper
never thought about outlawing pencils
after we rid the world of all dangers life wont be worth living
#382
Posted 19 June 2006 - 12:24 PM
after we rid the world of all dangers life wont be worth living
Hear hear! I've been hospitalised with eye injuries twice by a rhododendron bush, and also once with someone elses toenail, but I don't feel the need to campaign for them to be banned (or trimmed in the case of the toenail)
Personally, I think a crackdown on the more dodgy chemical suppliers who are willing to 'discreetly' distribute bulk chemicals of questionable purpose (precursors) to private individuals would be an infinitely more productive use of the CSPCs time, surely?
#383
Posted 19 June 2006 - 05:57 PM
Mumbles, maybe this is what you meant anyway by...
"The 4x as likely is per capita. So out of every 1,000 people, 4x as many are injured by pens and pencils than homemade fireworks,"
...but what BigG meant is that out of those 1000 people pretty much all of them will use pencils regularly, whereas maybe one (in fact I'd guess probably rather less than one in a thousand) ever has anything at all to do with homemade fireworks. If you took 1000 people who regularly made fireworks as well as regularly used pencils, you would definitely see a lot more firework injuries than pencil injuries.
I don't think there's a lot to be gained by comparing injury stats (although I know I've done it myself in the past). Everything in life has some risk associated with it, but making fireworks is inherently riskier than a lot of other things that one might choose to do - that's just something we've got to accept.
#384
Posted 20 June 2006 - 09:47 PM
Not saying that pyrotechnics *is* dangerous, just making a point that if we ban all of the potential dangers in the world, we will become a nation of zombies.
#385
Posted 07 October 2006 - 09:00 PM
Danger = Adrenalin
Adrenalin = fun, possibly addictive.
While pyrotechnics is not (AFAIK) done for the adrenalin rush, this is an aspect of many sports and hobbies (such as painballing) which certainly shouldnt be banned. Paintballing is quite a good example IMO, with appropriate (not overdone) safter precautions, it's great fun, and satisfying when you win, without those precautions, it becomes toatlly lethal. Pyrotechnics is very safe with appropriate safety precautions, when you suceed to make something, it's very satisfying, and you have the added bonus of learning along the way, yet when these are removed, like kids making M80s in their backyard, it becomes dangerous. The government is tyring to overdo the safety, so much so that there will be no way to enjoy pyrotechnics.
#386
Posted 09 October 2006 - 12:47 AM
Yes!All hail things like http://www.amazon.co...9549520-5166245
Not saying that pyrotechnics *is* dangerous, just making a point that if we ban all of the potential dangers in the world, we will become a nation of zombies.
It talks about all the fun risks children often used to get to take, to learn.
Then again a nation of television zombies is easier to control.
People take risks, whatever they do, some get hurt.
#387 Guest_Shrubsole_*
Posted 09 October 2006 - 12:49 PM
Having said all of that, it is we adults that have to suffer because of something a stupid kid does. If a kid gets burned mixing up the wrong chemicals or just not taking safety precautions, then the authorities just blanket ban FOR ALL whatever it was that the kid was playing with.
Mind you, the same could be said of terrorists. They ain't doing anyone any favours! Hence when I'm putting 100g of BP in a tube, I'm making AN EXPLOSIVE DEVICE under the same laws that stop terrorists doing it.
It is this distinction between us and the terrorists and the little kids playing around that needs to be made crystal clear and widened.
The only way that can be achieved is by education: of us and more importantly THEM!
The fact that the UKPS has been set up and trying to attract members of good standing is certainly a step in the right direction (Yes! I will be sending my membership next week) We have to conduct ourselves in an open adult manner before we are even seen to be taken seriously and as something completely different from a silly kid or a terrorist.
Still, I suppose a blanket ban is easier for the government.
Edited by Shrubsole, 09 October 2006 - 12:53 PM.
#388
Posted 09 October 2006 - 03:05 PM
Thats why I'm here.The fact that the UKPS has been set up and trying to attract members of good standing is certainly a step in the right direction (Yes! I will be sending my membership next week) We have to conduct ourselves in an open adult manner before we are even seen to be taken seriously and as something completely different from a silly kid or a terrorist.
Knowing the risks is one thing, understanding them is another.
#389
Posted 25 October 2006 - 10:35 PM
He corrected an order I made (his balance went wonky), giving me extra. He was conscientious enough to get it to me by return of post.
He isn't a pyro (I checked), he can list other chems if you ask.
http://cgi.ebay.co.u...1QQcmdZViewItem
#390 Guest_Shrubsole_*
Posted 25 October 2006 - 10:48 PM
I don't usually post ads but this guy seems to have some useful chems and lab sundries.
He corrected an order I made (his balance went wonky), giving me extra. He was conscientious enough to get it to me by return of post.
He isn't a pyro (I checked), he can list other chems if you ask.
http://cgi.ebay.co.u...1QQcmdZViewItem
...and a bit cheaper than Inoxia.
...and as you say fast postal service.
...ummm, intesting: I wonder what else he has for sale...?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users