

Edited by Anthony, 30 September 2005 - 10:20 AM.
Posted 30 September 2005 - 10:18 AM
Edited by Anthony, 30 September 2005 - 10:20 AM.
Posted 30 September 2005 - 03:19 PM
Posted 30 September 2005 - 07:41 PM
Posted 26 November 2005 - 01:51 PM
Posted 27 November 2005 - 03:24 PM
I suppose it's controversial, but I miss jumping jacks and aeroplanes. Crazy little things.
Posted 27 November 2005 - 04:39 PM
Posted 29 November 2005 - 09:03 AM
They were banned because quite simply they were very dangerous! Just think about it logically;if one of these things flew into your house it would cause injuries damage or even a house fire. The ban on such items in the early 70's was a sensible move and it helped to reduce serious injuries.I suppose it's controversial, but I miss jumping jacks and aeroplanes. Crazy little things.
Edited by Anthony, 29 November 2005 - 09:03 AM.
Posted 29 November 2005 - 11:04 AM
if one of these things flew into your house it would cause injuries damage or even a house fire.
Posted 29 November 2005 - 11:16 AM
I HAVE seen and endured a jumping jack coming into my home in Blackburn Lancashire when I was 1 years old, this was in a size 40 box of Standard Fireworks my dad had bought to let off on the 5th Nov(it was something that scared me stiff and I cried afterwards and it bounced into the kitchen banged around and ended up behind the washing machine creating loads of smoke), so I agree with and applaud the fireworks manufacturers for banning these. I also agree with banning aeroplanes and spinners because they flew and span anywhere and everywhere, there was NO real safe distance you could watch these from because of their erratic and unpredictable flight and movement. All-in-all a good thing really.Are you talking about jumping crackers or aeroplanes? Either way, how would either of these be more likely to "fly into your house" than any other rocket, wheel, candle etc? They cannot open doors or windows.
They were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers, due to political pressure, because "items of eratic or unpredictable flight" were deemed too dangerous for our increasingly un-eratic, predictable, controlled lives!
Edited by Anthony, 29 November 2005 - 11:18 AM.
Posted 29 November 2005 - 12:01 PM
I HAVE seen and endured a jumping jack coming into my home in Blackburn Lancashire when I was 1 years old, this was in a size 40 box of Standard Fireworks my dad had bought to let off on the 5th Nov(it was something that scared me stiff and I cried afterwards and it bounced into the kitchen banged around and ended up behind the washing machine creating loads of smoke), so I agree with and applaud the fireworks manufacturers for banning these. I also agree with banning aeroplanes and spinners because they flew and span anywhere and everywhere, there was NO real safe distance you could watch these from because of their erratic and unpredictable flight and movement. All-in-all a good thing really.
Posted 29 November 2005 - 01:37 PM
Posted 29 November 2005 - 08:35 PM
Posted 30 November 2005 - 09:31 AM
Posted 30 November 2005 - 12:47 PM
As far as jumping crackers go, I cannot "applaud the fireworks manufacturers for banning these" because if they were used correctly, ie placed on the ground in an open space & then lit, unless they were faulty (which can happen to any type of firework) they gave you ample time to get to a "safe" distance & enjoy them.
![]()
Open space?!?! We're talking gardens here, and there wasn't a specified safety distance on jumping jacks/aeroplanes/helicoptors and spinners in those days BUT some Standard fountains and a few roman candles in the selection boxes and sometimes sold separately would often say on the label
"Stand at least 30ft away upwind".
Posted 02 December 2005 - 06:48 PM
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users