Meshing and Pressing!
#1
Posted 03 January 2006 - 01:37 AM
#2
Posted 03 January 2006 - 01:46 AM
#3
Posted 03 January 2006 - 03:12 AM
#4
Posted 03 January 2006 - 11:07 PM
#5
Posted 04 January 2006 - 01:53 AM
Here is a site that contains a table converting mesh to microns, there are a few others around but I am not sure of the adresses. My memory of whom I aquired this link off has faded away, so my humble apologies to he or she who is missing out on the credit they deserve.
Edit: http://www.hummelcro...main/custo.html You may find the actual link useful, rather than my mindless ranting.
Edited by seymour, 04 January 2006 - 01:56 AM.
#6
Posted 05 January 2006 - 03:19 AM
sorry if i'm wrong, i remember reading about it some where but i don't really remember.
#7
Posted 17 January 2006 - 09:42 PM
#8
Posted 18 January 2006 - 06:43 AM
I don't fully understand what littlejohny is trying to say. Mesh is the number of holes per linear inch. A 60 mesh screen with have 60 openings per linear inch. I think there is a different method in metric countries, but it all works out to about the same size. A 60 mesh screen doesn't have 1/60th of an inch openings, it is actually a lot smaller than this due to the thickness of the wires.
yes thats what I ment.
#9
Posted 18 January 2006 - 07:07 AM
this is my first reply - I first thought, it would not work but it does.
Please dont read too accurate bercause mynglish is not the best - a little bit rusty while not often used.
One word about the sieves:
In my opinion, the american way of numbering the mesh size has no expressiveness.* The important thing is the diameter of the holes and this is varied by using thicker or thinner wires for the sieve. So the mesh size does not say anything about the size of the particles passing through.
In Germany we use the hole size give the sieves a name. Our sieves are called by example 200?m or 0.2mm what means the same.
In this way you can directly say, what size the passed particles will have or when using a stack of more sieves, in what range the fraction will be.
* Of course, everybody thinks his system would be the best.
MfG
newtoolsmith
Edited by newtoolsmith, 18 January 2006 - 07:30 AM.
#10
Posted 18 January 2006 - 09:42 AM
Most of the stuff even works with riced blackpowder. You only have to find out the right equivalent to the "original powder" used... Of course every grain has its ad and disadvantages but this is not THAT important most of the time
#11
Posted 18 January 2006 - 11:39 AM
is dat nich sch?n hier! Lauter Deutsche.
Nee, is klar, auf die tats?chliche Korngr??e kommt es so genau nicht drauf an aber bei unserer metrischen Deklaration der Maschenweite wei? man wenigstens, was man hat (die 200?m sollten auch nur ein Beispiel sein). Dies Feature haben die Anh?nger der z?lligen Messweise halt nicht, die wissen nur, wie viele Maschen sich einen Quadratzoll teilen m?ssen. Die Drahtst?rke muss man dann auch wissen. Metrisch ist halt besser aber erkl?r das mal nem Ami...
Here a short translation for our non-german friends:
The grainsize is of course not that important but when using the metric system you actually know the resulting grainsize (the 200?m should only be an example). This feature is not available when using the american or english standart system with mesh, inch and so on. For those, the diameter of the wire used for the sieve is important to know.
Please dont try to learn german with the text above, its hardly school-like!!
MfG
newtoolsmith
Edited by newtoolsmith, 18 January 2006 - 11:42 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users