Rocket guide sticks - Ideas for cheaper alternatives?
#1
Posted 19 January 2006 - 09:15 AM
Before I crack and try and find somewhere to saw up a load of planking into square rods for me, does anyone have any magic ideas for affordable stabilising nirvana? All suggestions and ideas appreciated. I'm sure someone out there has a simple, elegant, and (most importantly) dirt cheap solution to the problem...
So, what do you use to balance your larger rockets?
#2
Posted 19 January 2006 - 12:06 PM
Lots of straight long sticks for NotMuchCashAtAll[tm]
Edited by RegimentalPyro, 19 January 2006 - 12:07 PM.
#3
Posted 19 January 2006 - 01:28 PM
#4
Posted 19 January 2006 - 07:36 PM
There's always dirt cheap bamboo skewers for small rockets (I even found some jumbo ones that work well for 3/8" rockets), but it's hard to find sticks for 1/2" and above that are equally as negligibly expensive. None of the garden stakes I can find in my local area are long enough to balance my 1/2" rockets even without a header (and they don't work out all that cheaply, anyway). I've heard suggestions to use rods from bamboo blinds, but ideally I'd like something straight (could definitely be an option, though). Hardware store dowels and mouldings are right out for cost ($1AU per metre and up depending on size)...
Before I crack and try and find somewhere to saw up a load of planking into square rods for me, does anyone have any magic ideas for affordable stabilising nirvana? All suggestions and ideas appreciated. I'm sure someone out there has a simple, elegant, and (most importantly) dirt cheap solution to the problem...
So, what do you use to balance your larger rockets?
I get these - http://www.lbsgarden...=R-F12G&recno=1 - 250 of the 36". Good for all but really big rockets. Do a search for similar near you.
#5
Posted 19 January 2006 - 08:04 PM
With this saw its quite easy to cut a 10*10cm beam into sticks of 5*5mm or 8*8mm (my favorite dinemsions).
Only need is such a saw and a beam of the needed length !!without brenches!!(often found somewhere for free).
MfG
newtoolsmith
#6
Posted 19 January 2006 - 11:49 PM
I've launched 4 oz motors with such thin sticks. They worked but where erratic and too fragile before launch for my taste. You couldn't lift them by their stick without fear of breaking them.
http://nexus.cable.n...90/p0004665.jpg
If you can borrow or otherwise get access to a bench saw you can rip up those 40x10x1500 pine scraps bunnings sell for around $1 into many ~ 5 mm square sticks or a few larger ones for bigger rockets
Bunnings also sell stakes similar to those garden direct ones. Target used to sell tomato stakes that were perfect for 1 lb rockets, but I haven't seem them there in years.
http://www.vk2zay.net/
#7
Posted 22 January 2006 - 11:28 AM
Juggalos will carry on
Swing our hatchets if we must
each and every one of us
From lashes to ashes and from lust to dust
#8
Posted 22 January 2006 - 12:10 PM
Some also argue that square sticks offer more drag and hence can produce the required CP/CM stability with shorter lengths than round ones. I don't know that the effect is really that large of a difference, in my mind the mechanical properties are more important. It is definately significant with wide rectangular cross-section sticks, but square vrs circular is less noticeable and square sticks mass more for the same "size" anyway so the improvement may be completely pointless.
http://www.vk2zay.net/
#9
Posted 05 February 2006 - 04:00 PM
Time for a strange idea (NOT TESTED)Before I crack and try and find somewhere to saw up a load of planking into square rods for me, does anyone have any magic ideas for affordable stabilising nirvana? All suggestions and ideas appreciated. I'm sure someone out there has a simple, elegant, and (most importantly) dirt cheap solution to the problem...
So, what do you use to balance your larger rockets?
Why not find a small rod and make paper tubes, then balance using putty, clay, mud, whatever as a counterweight?
A crazy idea (DEFINITELY NOT TESTED)
I wonder if a suitable string with some weighting on the end might work, supporting the rocket on a ramp for launch?
I'd be fascinated if this pendulum idea works, not thought of it before.
If not, why not?
Simon
#10
Posted 05 February 2006 - 06:24 PM
#11
Posted 05 February 2006 - 07:07 PM
I might try the string idea just to see what happens; Reasoning that, if the main function of a stick is to force the rocket to point upwards, a pendulum should basically do the same. Stability would be poor initially but improve with acceleration. Think I'll wear the bike helmet thoughthe string idea won't work, but the paper tube sounds interesting.
I have another reason for suggesting a tube, if the tube were left open (weighting being provided by the thickness, rather than attached) the minumum air resistance would be straight down the tube, any deviation in flight being resisted by the side of the tube acting like a sail.
(elliptical sails were once used on a transatlantic ship, if my addled memory serves me).
Simon
#12
Posted 05 February 2006 - 09:25 PM
Yes a helmet would be a good idea with a pendulum 'stabilizer'. I predict a tumbling trajectory in a random direction. The main function of the stick is not to force the rocket to point upwards, but to impart drag behind the center of mass, which you are not going to get from a string and a weight. You might just pull the center of mass to the rear, greatly *decreasing* stability ? I assume you plan to use a flame proof string ( kevlar?).I might try the string idea just to see what happens; Reasoning that, if the main function of a stick is to force the rocket to point upwards, a pendulum should basically do the same. Stability would be poor initially but improve with acceleration. Think I'll wear the bike helmet though
I have another reason for suggesting a tube, if the tube were left open (weighting being provided by the thickness, rather than attached) the minumum air resistance would be straight down the tube, any deviation in flight being resisted by the side of the tube acting like a sail.
(elliptical sails were once used on a transatlantic ship, if my addled memory serves me).
Simon
KAABLAAAMMM!!!
"OK... that shows you what could potentially happen."
--Homer Simpson
#13
Posted 06 February 2006 - 12:17 PM
Yes, I can visualise a very shaky start and a spectacularly spinning end as the weight overtakes the motor!Yes a helmet would be a good idea with a pendulum 'stabilizer'. I predict a tumbling trajectory in a random direction. The main function of the stick is not to force the rocket to point upwards, but to impart drag behind the center of mass, which you are not going to get from a string and a weight. You might just pull the center of mass to the rear, greatly *decreasing* stability ? I assume you plan to use a flame proof string ( kevlar?).
I like coming up with wacky ideas, at least I get to learn from why they don't work plus the initial excitement of uncertainty. (Admin/Mods - On a small enough scale not to be seriously dangerous <=25g motors, total weight)
The tube idea is serious, I'd be interested in the results if someone with more experience tried this. My motors are on such a small scale and too inconsistent.
Maybe I should be in the rocket forum with this.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users