

Edited by seymour, 19 April 2005 - 01:07 PM.
Posted 15 March 2005 - 08:15 AM
Edited by seymour, 19 April 2005 - 01:07 PM.
Posted 15 March 2005 - 01:56 PM
Now this is something new.
Try looking here.
http://www.jtbaker.c...hhtml/P5620.htm
Estimated lethal dose is 15-30grams
Posted 15 March 2005 - 02:11 PM
Not to be promoting unsafe practices, but LD50 for table salt isn't a very big dose either.
Posted 17 March 2005 - 03:18 PM
Edited by Old1953, 17 March 2005 - 03:20 PM.
Posted 18 March 2005 - 03:18 AM
Posted 18 March 2005 - 04:47 AM
Arsenic and Lead in pyro aren't likely to be acute poisons, but soluble forms have roughly the same acute toxicity as soluble barium compounds. They aren't really *that* toxic. However I'd much rather be poisoned by Barium, it is easy to treat and leaves no long-term effects. Months of chelation therapy for heavy metal poisoning isn't very pleasent at all, and the neurological damage is pretty much permanent while the metabolic effects of Barium are gone in a day and the skeleton deposition is nothing to really worry about.
One thing I've always wondered is why sparklers aren't more controlled. There is a lethal dose of Barium Nitrate in a box of sparklers. And chewing on a single sparkler could do in a small animal or child. I guess they don't taste too nice, but I could see a child or dog chewing on one.
I too can't believe how easy it is to get Vanadium Pentoxide, it is horrendously toxic and a pretty colour too.
Posted 07 July 2005 - 04:59 PM
Posted 14 November 2005 - 09:29 PM
a simple dust mask should be worn when mixing dry barium or stontium or manganese compounds
Edited by GuiltyCol, 14 November 2005 - 09:29 PM.
Posted 15 November 2005 - 10:12 AM
They still apply it to golf courses in the US for grub control.
Ok just to be clear about 2 things. Are you saying that a simple B&Q dusk mask is suitable protection from the dust that these chemicals kick up? My understanding was that dust masks come in various grades, some being "finer" than others?
Are you also saying that dust masks are only applicable for these 2 chemicals and not required for anything else? Sorry to be a bore, but this thread gives me the heeby jeebies!
Posted 16 November 2005 - 04:32 AM
the masks you can buy from B&Q that are referred to as comfort masks give no protection from anything at all.
Posted 16 November 2005 - 06:30 AM
Posted 16 November 2005 - 06:34 AM
Haha, having used them before, I can confirm that they are in no way comfortable! But thanks, will be on the look out for P3 masks.
Hmmm just thought I'd recheck my IPP which arrived the other day, and yep, thought I remembered correctly. From P5, Saftey Chapter: "A respirator should be used when performing an operation that might cause dusts to become airbourne. The simple paper face masks are inadequate to provide proper protection. Many DIY and paint stores sell good respirators for under $20"
Posted 16 November 2005 - 06:54 AM
Yes I realise that, my post was a joke, hence the use of the "Haha" prefix.I think he meant comfort meaning something there to make you feel more comfortable about working around said dusts but not actually providing proper protection. Comfort as in bringing a feeling of safety.
Just gunshots! Really you guys across the pond have a real issue with guns.not sure if it's salutes or just gunshots,
And what exactly is a multi-gas cartridge? I assume that's the filter? And how would I know if it covers all the nasty gases I need it to?The included multi-gas cartridges, provides respiratory protection from certain organic vapors, chlorine, hydrogen chloride, sulfur dioxide, chlorine dioxide, hydrogen fluoride, ammonia, methylamine, formaldehyde or hydrogen sulfide (escape only) at concentrations up to 10 times the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) with half facepieces or 50 times PEL with full facepieces. Includes mask & 1 set of multi-gas cartridges.
Posted 10 August 2007 - 03:39 PM
Posted 10 August 2007 - 04:36 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users