Edited by sasman, 25 October 2010 - 09:38 PM.
Press
#16
Posted 29 April 2007 - 10:58 PM
#17
Posted 30 April 2007 - 04:53 PM
There are many bold pyros
But there are not very many
Old, Bold Pyros" - author unknown
#18
Posted 30 April 2007 - 07:38 PM
If anyone knows how to do it properly please let me know! In which case i should still have some spare if you are interested Pymp.
#19
Posted 30 April 2007 - 08:06 PM
#20
Posted 30 April 2007 - 10:10 PM
Edited by pymp, 08 May 2007 - 01:49 PM.
There are many bold pyros
But there are not very many
Old, Bold Pyros" - author unknown
#21
Posted 01 May 2007 - 12:05 AM
If anyone wants some Ill go down to the depot and ask if the old stuff is available.
anyone?
Click here for Cooperman435, THE online shop for chemicals, materials and tooling
Click here to email me Personally,
Click here to email Optimum Fireworks, West Yorkshire's premium Display Company
#22
Posted 02 May 2007 - 03:35 PM
http://www.thecalder...lastShield1.htm
So as it suggests using 2 or 3 sheets should give added safety.
There was a discussion on rec.pyro recently and the general opinion was that sheets should be layered with no gaps between them. The logic being having gaps makes the setup weaker much like a karate chop can break a stack of planks with gaps but not without. I'm sure I've read somewhere ages ago that the opposite was true and with lexan sheets it's better to have gaps between the sheets. Also not to drill bolt holes as this introduces weak points. Does anyone have any hard information, rather than the karate example, which is better - gaps between sheets or not?
#23
Posted 02 May 2007 - 04:47 PM
If bolt holes weaken the structure too much, what is the best method of securing it? A clamp of some sort perhaps?
There are many bold pyros
But there are not very many
Old, Bold Pyros" - author unknown
#24
Posted 02 May 2007 - 07:37 PM
The abuse they could take was amazing. Just think of a fit 96kg man jumping at a shield with his feet. They just bounced off.
Edited by barra69, 02 May 2007 - 07:39 PM.
#25
Posted 09 June 2007 - 04:50 PM
#26
Posted 09 June 2007 - 05:43 PM
You might need to check what you have is strong & shatterproof.
#27
Posted 09 June 2007 - 05:56 PM
http://www.arielplas...rene/index.aspx
Its clear polystyrene.
#28
Posted 09 June 2007 - 06:41 PM
http://www.boedeker.com/polyst_p.htm
Edited by portfire, 09 June 2007 - 06:45 PM.
#29
Posted 09 June 2007 - 07:24 PM
Sorry should have been more specific.This is there website
http://www.arielplas...rene/index.aspx
Its clear polystyrene.
Too brittle, and liable to fragment into shrapnel instead of acting as a shield. Polycarbonate is the only way to go.
KAABLAAAMMM!!!
"OK... that shows you what could potentially happen."
--Homer Simpson
#30
Posted 09 June 2007 - 07:47 PM
regards
dean
Edited by portfire, 09 June 2007 - 07:50 PM.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users