Jump to content


Photo

Just Wondering


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 juggalo_pyro

juggalo_pyro

    Member

  • General Public Members
  • PipPip
  • 16 posts

Posted 15 April 2006 - 04:34 AM

I may be able to secure a phenomenal amount (50 lbs/22.5 kilograms) of pure carbon powder, and I was wondering just how it would affect my black powder and just exacaly what it would do to it .
We will never die alone
Juggalos will carry on
Swing our hatchets if we must
each and every one of us


From lashes to ashes and from lust to dust

#2 Pretty green flames

Pretty green flames

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 689 posts

Posted 15 April 2006 - 05:52 AM

I may be able to secure a phenomenal amount (50 lbs/22.5 kilograms) of pure carbon powder, and I was wondering just how it would affect my black powder and just exacaly what it would do to it .


In a couple of words, it total crap.
Charcoal has impurities mixed in which increases burning speed of BP so when you take those impurities away
you are left with pure carbon which has little or no use that i can think of.

Is this like graphite or something?

#3 juggalo_pyro

juggalo_pyro

    Member

  • General Public Members
  • PipPip
  • 16 posts

Posted 15 April 2006 - 07:52 AM

its pure carbon for a rig setup out here so im not sure what it is other than carbon thanks for the info though
We will never die alone
Juggalos will carry on
Swing our hatchets if we must
each and every one of us


From lashes to ashes and from lust to dust

#4 EnigmaticBiker

EnigmaticBiker

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 365 posts

Posted 16 April 2006 - 02:25 PM

I may be able to secure a phenomenal amount (50 lbs/22.5 kilograms) of pure carbon powder, and I was wondering just how it would affect my black powder and just exacaly what it would do to it .

Charcoal also has a porous structure which allows the KNO3 and sulphur to be incorporated into it. So the BP behaves more like a compound than a mixture of three ingredients.

If it's graphite powder you're talking about, each particle is likely to be a solid mass. It is used to slow down and polish gunpowder grains for a more controlled burning propellant.


#5 Andrew

Andrew

    Rocket Scientist, no really, I am!

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 603 posts

Posted 17 April 2006 - 10:38 AM

If it is graphite, which it almost certainly is, it will be artificial, which is made from subjecting the left over fractions form crude oil that no one wants to a charcoaling process. The resultant mess is graphite but there is still a lot of nasty oils left. Those oils really hamper the burning of bp. Also as mentioned before, the graphite will cost all the other ingredients rather than making a homogenous powder, natural graphite does this as well. This property makes it very difficult to light, and it cam self extinguish in small amounts. If it is natural or grown it will be a lot more expensive, and will tend to be full of dirt, not very flammable! Well not full of but you get the idea.

If it is pure carbon, in a tetrahedral bond arrangement, can I buy some from you??

All in all graphite does not make very good bp.

#6 neo

neo

    Member

  • General Public Members
  • PipPip
  • 94 posts

Posted 17 April 2006 - 10:44 AM

but how is it with activated charcoal? should'nt that be faster than norman charcoal? it got atleast more surface area..

sorry for stealing your thread a bit ;)
Pyrotechnics, the art of fire!

#7 EnigmaticBiker

EnigmaticBiker

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 365 posts

Posted 17 April 2006 - 11:01 AM

If it is pure carbon, in a tetrahedral bond arrangement, can I buy some from you??


:D No use for BP, it's a b*stard to mill as well.


#8 juggalo_pyro

juggalo_pyro

    Member

  • General Public Members
  • PipPip
  • 16 posts

Posted 19 April 2006 - 05:27 PM

but how is it with activated charcoal? should'nt that be faster than norman charcoal? it got atleast more surface area..

sorry for stealing your thread a bit ;)

no problem on stealing the thread Neo and on the matter of activated charcoal and carbon I tried that once with the activated carbon in fish tank filters that never got used and it doesn't work worth a crap I couldn?t even get it to light with a blow torch on it for about 2 minutes I suppose if you put it in a wood fire it may work but just strait it won't because it comes pure then its activated so that it readily picks up surrounding impurities that?s why they use it in filters so like I said maybe try putting it in a wood fire so it can try and pick up the impurities bp uses otherwise its useless
We will never die alone
Juggalos will carry on
Swing our hatchets if we must
each and every one of us


From lashes to ashes and from lust to dust

#9 EnigmaticBiker

EnigmaticBiker

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 365 posts

Posted 19 April 2006 - 06:38 PM

but how is it with activated charcoal? should'nt that be faster than norman charcoal? it got atleast more surface area..

sorry for stealing your thread a bit ;)

Activated charcoal didn't work very well for me.
It is often called activated carbon and is not necessarily made from wood charcoal.
It is very porous but has a different structure to wood or straw charcoal.

Try Wikipedia for more details:- http://en.wikipedia....ctivated_carbon


#10 Andrew

Andrew

    Rocket Scientist, no really, I am!

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 603 posts

Posted 20 April 2006 - 01:36 PM


:D No use for BP, it's a b*stard to mill as well.


didn't want it for bp, just to sell on at stupid profit, :D

if you did try to ball mill it, it would probably mill your ceramic balls to powder. :lol:

#11 pyrotrev

pyrotrev

    Pyro Forum Top Trump

  • UKPS Members
  • 1,112 posts

Posted 20 April 2006 - 07:00 PM

No use for BP, it's a b*stard to mill as well

Maybe, but it looks a hell of a lot better on the girlfriend than airfloat charcoal! :P

Edited by pyrotrev, 20 April 2006 - 07:05 PM.

Trying to do something very beautiful but very dangerous very safely....

#12 EnigmaticBiker

EnigmaticBiker

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 365 posts

Posted 20 April 2006 - 07:19 PM

Maybe, but it looks a hell of a lot better on the girlfriend than airfloat charcoal! :P

Somewhere out there, there's probably a kinky, obsessive pyro, who just can't resist that faint smell of willow whilst...
:P



#13 Andrew

Andrew

    Rocket Scientist, no really, I am!

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 603 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 02:55 PM

LMFAO :lol:

#14 Kayakujutsu

Kayakujutsu

    New Member

  • General Public Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 04:52 PM

but how is it with activated charcoal? should'nt that be faster than norman charcoal? it got atleast more surface area..

sorry for stealing your thread a bit ;)



Activated charcoal is normal charcoal which has been steam treated to remove all the goodies which makes black powder burn fast, if only we new what goodies was removed we could add them to activated charcoal and make the best willow subsitute available. could sell that for a fortune.... :)

#15 EnigmaticBiker

EnigmaticBiker

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 365 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 08:22 PM

Activated charcoal is normal charcoal which has been steam treated to remove all the goodies which makes black powder burn fast, if only we new what goodies was removed we could add them to activated charcoal and make the best willow subsitute available. could sell that for a fortune.... :)

I agree that much activated charcoal is made from wood, but have read that other sources of organic materials are also used.

The structure is also altered as the wiki article quoted above states.

As to the substances removed by high pressure/temp steam treatment, does anyone out there have access to GC or HPLC equipment?
Somebody is likely to have already done this.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users