Magnalium
#1
Posted 07 January 2007 - 03:40 AM
#2
Posted 07 January 2007 - 11:01 AM
I prefer magnalium therefor because it is made and milled very easy and I have a large mass of magnesium to produce it (old VW Käfer engine).
I tried using it for flash but it didnt work. I think MgAl is much too brittle to be flake shaped after milling.
Mfg
newtoolsmith
#3
Posted 07 January 2007 - 11:08 AM
The course Mg/Al will be usable in gerbs, often providing a nice crackling / sizzling effect. Try a basic gerb composition with around 10% metal content. A wider range of mesh sizes will provide a more visually appealing effect. Make sure you use a press, ramming is not advised!
#4
Posted 07 January 2007 - 08:23 PM
#5
Posted 07 January 2007 - 08:39 PM
As Richard suggested, your coarser Magnalium is probably best suited to gerbs. I'm not sure if it's slightly TOO coarse, but you might find some use for it in strobes and crackling microstars.
#6
Posted 07 January 2007 - 09:14 PM
I'd try the -325 in your Veline stars. I don't think it will make much difference in performance other than to increase burn speed somewhat.
I have used very fine magnalium (5 micron) in Veline stars and it works well. The burn rate might be slightly higher, but they seem relatively easy to ignite, you still get some of the 'sizzle' and the colours seem fine.
Edited by BrightStar, 07 January 2007 - 09:20 PM.
#7
Posted 07 January 2007 - 10:47 PM
#8
Posted 14 February 2007 - 07:44 AM
#9
Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:04 PM
Barium Nitrate 51
Potassium nitrate 7
Sulfur 19
Magnalium 18
Dextrin 5
I dont fancy making magnalium and from what I've read the 10 micron for sale at hobbychem is unlikely to work well. Would this be a better buy at -250mesh? I'm not too sure how mesh converts to micron but from what i've read would I be correct in thinking -250 mesh is about 50 micron?
Also would I need to coat the magnalium in this formula?
#10
Posted 31 March 2007 - 03:24 PM
One thing suprised me was recently I accidentally tried lighting some of these stars semi wet. They were extremely hard to ignite but i found that they burnt with a very slow strobe. I was thinking could a delay agent be used to compensate for using higher mesh Magnalium?
#11
Posted 31 March 2007 - 05:08 PM
Also would I need to coat the magnalium in this formula?
Adding 1% boric acid in your solution is probably a better strategy. Mg/Al is more like Aluminium in its reactivity, and so similar precautions should be taken in its use. Also try to use as little water as possible.
#12
Posted 31 March 2007 - 06:39 PM
#13
Posted 02 April 2007 - 09:29 PM
I was just reading the thread about strobing formulas. I was thinking of trying this formula
Barium Nitrate 51
Potassium nitrate 7
Sulfur 19
Magnalium 18
Dextrin 5
I dont fancy making magnalium and from what I've read the 10 micron for sale at hobbychem is unlikely to work well. Would this be a better buy at -250mesh? I'm not too sure how mesh converts to micron but from what i've read would I be correct in thinking -250 mesh is about 50 micron?
Also would I need to coat the magnalium in this formula?
I managed to get a video of these stars using -250 mesh .....
http://s85.photobuck...estarmine-1.flv
More of a twinkling effect but still quite pretty.
#14
Posted 27 April 2007 - 09:00 PM
#15
Posted 28 April 2007 - 01:54 PM
The problem with this is i'm finding there is a delay before ignition and combined with thier slow burn rate they more often then not end up hitting the floor. For example below is a star mine I made with these stars...
http://www.youtube.c...4...ser&search=
Is there anyway around this? I was thinking of mabey trying a perchlorate based prime but i'm not sure if would be hot enough. Anyone have any ideas?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users