Jumping Jacks
#1
Posted 31 May 2007 - 09:46 PM
I can see there are ones of the same name still available in the USA, are they the same thing? as I've always wanted to see what all the fuss was about to get them banned 30 odd years ago.
Silly question but it seems the appropriate place to finally get an age old question answered.
Take time for example, have too much of it and you will eventually die....
#2
Posted 31 May 2007 - 10:02 PM
I can send you some pictures of several old British Jumping Crackers and a video of an old one going off (not brilliant).
Let me have your email address and I'll get them off to you.
They were banned because they fly all over the place - often in the direction of the audience. They were good fun though, if you escaped unharmed!! A bit similar to the banning of all other fireworks of erratic flight (helicopters, flyers, mini rockets, etc).
Cheers.
#3
Posted 01 June 2007 - 12:56 AM
http://www.fireworkm...s/DSCN3496.html
http://www.cyberheri...s/IMG_1907.html
http://www.cyberheri...s/IMG_1935.html
The procedure for making them is outlined in Weingart. I've tried making some from quickmatch but they never really worked. Firefiend, any chance you could upload the pics/vid to http://pyrotechnics.no-ip.org/?
#4
Posted 01 June 2007 - 10:46 AM
Jumping Cracker (1'') with Red String
Jumping Cracker (1.5'') with Blue Tape (Brock's)
Jumping Cracker (2'') with Green String (Standard)
Jumping Cracker (2'') with Red String (Wells)
Jumping Cracker (2'') with White String (Excelsior)
Jumping Cracker (2.5'') with Red String
Jumping Cracker (2.5'') with Red String (Wells)
Jumping Cracker (2.25'') with Red Tape (Rainbow)
Jumping Cracker (3.25'') with Green String (Wilder's)
Jumping Cracker (3.25'') with Red String (Wells)
Video is not that spectacular, but you have to bear in mind it was a small cracker, which was around 40 years old when it expired!!
Jumping Cracker Video (Excelsior 2”)
#5
Posted 01 June 2007 - 11:07 AM
Was that a genuine old firework?
#6
Posted 01 June 2007 - 11:49 AM
It was in poor condition, so I thought I'd sacrifice it to get a video.
Funny thing is, you can just about make out someone saying 'why do they call them Jumping Crackers' !!!!!
#7
Posted 01 June 2007 - 12:10 PM
#8
Posted 01 June 2007 - 12:49 PM
Jumping Cracker Manufacture
Edited by Firefiend, 01 June 2007 - 12:57 PM.
#9
Posted 01 June 2007 - 01:33 PM
To get maximum results from this method you need to 'paint' a relativley large amount of a slow burning composition (greenmeal works great) onto the craft. However the hardest thing about creating these devices is getting the string tension right, too tight and it will fail to pass the fire to the next section, too slack and it will behave just like quickmatch.
Thanks to Blaf for the tutorial on the Gamekeeper forum:
http://pyroforum.nl/...p?showtopic=257
Hope this helps,
James
#10
Posted 01 June 2007 - 01:33 PM
Are the tubes parallel wound? It must be quite time consuming to make such devices and to load the powder in such a narrow tube. Just like a Catherine wheel really. I'd love to know how its done quickly! There must be a knack. Someone out there who worked at one of the UK company's must be on this site or at least have had a look. They must have so much valuable info to share with us all.
It's all there in Weingart! I doubt the tubes are parallel-wound. They're loaded in bundles, damp, by hand, but that's all I can remember without the literature at hand. I believe the article also covers details of the frame in RipRap's photo.
James, I never heard of that method , but it does sound interesting. Certainly more effective than trying to modify quickmatch like I've tried!
Edited by Creepin_pyro, 01 June 2007 - 01:39 PM.
#11
Posted 01 June 2007 - 01:46 PM
The ones with string look better but tape is easier. Not sure on the difference in quality though.
#12
Posted 01 June 2007 - 03:54 PM
James
#13
Posted 01 June 2007 - 07:13 PM
#14
Posted 01 June 2007 - 09:12 PM
I had a feeling that I might get someone to tell me roughly what they used to do, but actually seeing photos and A VIDEO..... well that has solved many a question, I really have to say I thought it was a long straight firework (bit like a portafire) but with multiple staged explosions, I had no idea they looked or acted in that way.....
In my warped mind, did they create a huge one especially for publice events and throw them into the crowd for a bit of entertainment.....joking.
My ambition now it to try and make one of those eventually, just to say I can
As for those planes and helicopters, they look just lethal, imagine the hype if some of those came on sale somehow nowerdays. they do look like they'd actually fly though but just above the ground.... it's be interesting how many of them actually caused nasty injuries.
Take time for example, have too much of it and you will eventually die....
#15
Posted 02 June 2007 - 01:14 AM
Right...ermmm......WOW.
I had a feeling that I might get someone to tell me roughly what they used to do, but actually seeing photos and A VIDEO..... well that has solved many a question, I really have to say I thought it was a long straight firework (bit like a portafire) but with multiple staged explosions, I had no idea they looked or acted in that way.....
In my warped mind, did they create a huge one especially for publice events and throw them into the crowd for a bit of entertainment.....joking.
My ambition now it to try and make one of those eventually, just to say I can
As for those planes and helicopters, they look just lethal, imagine the hype if some of those came on sale somehow nowerdays. they do look like they'd actually fly though but just above the ground.... it's be interesting how many of them actually caused nasty injuries.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users