Coloured Flash Comps.
#16
Posted 13 September 2007 - 09:41 AM
I think if blue/purple flashes were this simple and easy, they would be available commercially, which as far as I'm aware they're not.
#17
Posted 13 September 2007 - 07:37 PM
Nobody has tried black copper oxide formulas, have they? Perhaps copper oxychloride being both a copper compound and a chlorine donor.
Remember people, this is of course all science--- experimentation and development.
We might get somewhere someday.
I'd be experimenting like a nutbar if I had the resources any of you did - as I have to "pioneer" for most of my ingredients, being in Canada.
#18
Posted 13 September 2007 - 07:46 PM
Regards,
Mike
#19
Posted 13 September 2007 - 10:13 PM
#20
Posted 15 September 2007 - 03:16 PM
Ive had commercial aerial salutes, which are fairly loud AND have really vivid colours, so these comps must exist. I didnt think this was going to be so difficult...but im enjoying the experimentation
As for annoyed neighbours, just clocked up my 2nd complaint!
Edited by BigBang, 15 September 2007 - 03:18 PM.
#21
Posted 15 September 2007 - 05:28 PM
I can buy coloured flash in white red green and amber, but only transformation fire powder in red blue green amber
Edited by Arthur Brown, 15 September 2007 - 05:33 PM.
Keep mannequins and watermelons away from fireworks..they always get hurt..
#22
Posted 15 September 2007 - 07:08 PM
Additionally we have constant construction, a train track not more than a few hundred feet away, and about ten dogs living next door, and a ton of people seem to be importing fireworks from the states.
So.
What can I say, it's not anything too big if I light a few bangers... Here and there.
Today I tried adding magnesium to a red Chlorate / Strontium Nitrate / Strontium Carbonate composition which a friend made for me and the bang was very weak but the flash was nicely coloured.
I think measures such as making a thick container, leaving it half full for expansion of gasses, etc. would do better to make a report than just using a powerful composition in this case scenario.
#23
Posted 16 September 2007 - 03:49 AM
Well I tested the comp I made up and WOW it has a VERY nice deep color, I will see how it does as a report comp tommorow with video hopefully.
Edited by al93535, 16 September 2007 - 04:56 AM.
#24
Posted 21 September 2007 - 01:20 PM
Back to the drawing board!
#25
Posted 21 September 2007 - 04:41 PM
Back to the drawing board!
Bad luck... The whole point of using Mg is supposedly so that it doesn't wash out the colours. Did you include +10% PVC or were they raw 50/50 mixes?
It's interesting there are good results reported on adding extra carbonates - not sure I fully understand that quite yet...
Edited by BrightStar, 21 September 2007 - 04:48 PM.
#26
Posted 21 September 2007 - 06:21 PM
Theatrical flashes are contained under a paper layer like thick copier paper say 100gsm. Theatrical maroons have the same compound in a heavy card tube with sealed end plugs. The small maroon and the stage flashpot have the same amount of the same powder one bangs loudly (150dB) one flashes brightly but quietly.
A device with flash and bang will need a carefully chosen confinement to optimise both. OR will need to be two different devices at the same time.
Keep mannequins and watermelons away from fireworks..they always get hurt..
#27
Posted 21 September 2007 - 11:05 PM
Bad luck... The whole point of using Mg is supposedly so that it doesn't wash out the colours. Did you include +10% PVC or were they raw 50/50 mixes?
It's interesting there are good results reported on adding extra carbonates - not sure I fully understand that quite yet...
I always thought that the high burn temp of Mg would have the opposite effect, and actually wash out the colours, but whichever is correct, these comps did not work at all. The exact formulas i tried are
Mg 45
parlon 5
BaNO3 50
I also tried reducing the Mg to 40 parts, and increasing the parlon to 10 parts, but this slowed the reaction down too much.
I can see that this isnt going to be as easy as i thought!
Edited by BigBang, 21 September 2007 - 11:06 PM.
#28
Posted 22 September 2007 - 01:20 AM
Mesh, shape...
Edited by pudi.dk, 22 September 2007 - 01:21 AM.
#29
Posted 22 September 2007 - 11:55 AM
#30
Posted 23 September 2007 - 06:41 PM
Secondly, the oxidizer might not be doing the job of a colourant very well. Can I have a list of all the different [per]chlorates we fellows have present here?
Thirdly, I can still garuntee you that a finely powdered, highly oxidized star composition with a very small percentage of magnesium (10% of the weight) will accomplish quite a sound.
And From what I have seen here most of the basis has been on trying to balance noise and colour, which I think is a great goal but is one that needs to be worked on in the end in favour of colour.
What you need to do is create a casing that will assist in creating a report, rather than trying to use a faster flash. In the longrun you may STILL achieve an absofriggenlutely amazing report with an equally nice amount of colour.
There are several options which we have demonstrated with black powder
-Granulate the composition
-Use rice hulls as a percentage of the composition present to accelerate the propogation
-Allow up to 75% expandable room for the composition to combust
-A THICKER SHELL
-And finally, make sure it's set off in the right place! Ground salutes don't create that much sound versus the sound of a well placed aerial salute (30+ meters)
Lastly, I would LOVE me some aquamarine coloured flash bangs.
Edited by MDH, 23 September 2007 - 06:50 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users