Whistle Versus Flash For Burst On Shells
#1
Posted 20 February 2008 - 11:50 AM
I would appreciate hearing what folks are using and why.
#2
Posted 20 February 2008 - 12:05 PM
Personally, flash because for me I feel it provides a better break.
With regards to Whistle being more sensitive however... I think it depends very much on the formula, Salicylate or benzoate? Fe2O3 or CuOCl (for example)?
#3
Posted 20 February 2008 - 01:40 PM
but I speak as a Chemist rather than a Pyro.
#4
Posted 20 February 2008 - 06:44 PM
If you image closing a small shell, it is not yet glued or pasted and so would not burst in the conventional manner. In case of an accident at this stage, a flash boosted burst might lead to more of a hazard than slow burning unconfined whistle. On the other hand, I could see myself preferring to use a small quantity of 70/30 flash (hopefully mixed by someone else) in big shells for the purported lower friction sensitivity. With the larger shells an accident would probably be equally serious either way.
One trend I have seen from across the pond for 6" ball shells is to dust the BP burst with slow nitrate flash (KNO3, S, Bright flake Al) before use. This is apparently a good booster but is it safer? Does anyone know?
Edited by BrightStar, 20 February 2008 - 07:13 PM.
#5
Posted 20 February 2008 - 07:04 PM
I have no idea as to longevity in way of shelf-life however, I don`t like metal oxidizer mixes fullstop anyway.
#6
Posted 20 February 2008 - 07:39 PM
I personally use Perch flash reduced with KNO3 to make it a bit more forgiving.
#7
Posted 20 February 2008 - 07:51 PM
#8
Posted 20 February 2008 - 08:05 PM
For a round shell i would use some tissue paper for the flash bag {not loo paper }and for a can shell i would use a couple of turns of 70lb craft paper,sorry to ask its properly on the forum somewhere what material are you using as a flash bag?
regards.
#9
Posted 20 February 2008 - 09:16 PM
I have been using a 70/30 whistle mix made by diapering as a booster for burst on spherical shells and it has worked well for me. At the Western Pyro Association Winter Blast I saw a lot of folks using flash as a booster and claiming it is "safer" than whistle for building spherical shells. The comment was that Whistle is more friction and shock sensitive than flash and hence flash is "safer". Their thought is that the closing of the shell inherently has frictional grinding of the whistle between the rice hulls and also potentially an impulse to the whistle from taping on the shell to settle the contents in order to help close the shell.
I would appreciate hearing what folks are using and why.
When I use flash in round shells, it's in a coupette ( flash bag - either a "bubble" of saran wrap, or paper tube such as coin wrapper or 2 turns of 30lb kraft ), which isolates it from friction during loading/closing of the shell.
With whistle, I usually dump a few grams at the center of the shell, I never really gave it much thought as to the sensitivity of whistle, I dust whistle on KP/rice hulls for burst in cylindrical shells all the time though, have not used flash as a booster in those... I guess a few sensitivity comparison tests are in order.
KAABLAAAMMM!!!
"OK... that shows you what could potentially happen."
--Homer Simpson
#10
Posted 20 February 2008 - 10:05 PM
Now thats a tough one,
Personally, flash because for me I feel it provides a better break.
With regards to Whistle being more sensitive however... I think it depends very much on the formula, Salicylate or benzoate? Fe2O3 or CuOCl (for example)?
I'll be very intrested to see where they got thier information. Any reasearch I read suggest that flash is more sensetive then whistle, and whistle comp has a much smaller record of accidents on sites that process both. The law - backed by wide reseach put seavere limit of flash becuase of those issues (in europe, no one device can have more then six gram of flash) - such issues do not exists with Whistel comp.
I do not use flash AT ALL.
#11
Posted 21 February 2008 - 02:38 AM
#12
Posted 21 February 2008 - 06:16 AM
#13
Posted 21 February 2008 - 01:13 PM
#14
Posted 22 February 2008 - 10:37 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users