I recall seeing in several texts in the past that devices containing flash were never filled completely, in order to allow the blast wave to develop so that a more prominent report is produced.
That is definitely one school of thought and some are produced in that manner, however I have seen both types of device and there seems to be no audible difference in volume for the same amount of flash(well on the larger ones anyway).
I have heard flash described as a negative explosive as the cooled reaction products occupy less volume than the reactants, however I am not sure that this is true during the reaction (I am sure that someone with more knowledge can chip in here). I believe that this is why people assume that a volume of air is required in the device so that it is heated to create some volume change.
really????
I presume thats as flash doesnt work by a rapid produduction of gas, and so the volume contained isn't all that important.....
he sits looking at his collection of old toilet rolls....and that Plastic tube in the corner....about toilet roll tube size......HMMMMM he thinks....
On another note......The general public wants to hear loud.....but doesnt want their ear drums to bleed.....
I'd love to see the db meter reading at 30 M away from a 125mm bottle FILLED with flash..........Or even better a pressure wave reading.
Ive heard some fairly loud ones....all of them were less than 25G.....just very very well confined......and all of them were remote, from 50M+......
I think this all depends on the flash people use..........Is it a perchlorate based flash in these maroons....or something slightly less powerfull....
Yep different types of flash are more or less powerfull than each other.
I am sure that with small amounts of flash containment can make a difference to volume, however I am sceptical (but prepared to be proved wrong) whether it makes that much of a difference when talking about larger amounts as it is the shock wave from the detonation (not deflagration) that creates the chest pounding thump and I am sure that confinement will make little difference to the detonation velocity.
If you take 1g of perchlorate flash and burn it on a flat plate (suitable safety precautions etc) it will burn very quickly, now put that same 1g of flash in an open ended tube and do the same. Even in the open ended tube it offers enough containment to cause the powder to detonate think air b*mb volume with very little containment.
Now if you tried that with some of the more dangerous flash mixes you would find that 1g can detonate with no confinement at all other than its own mass.
Most of this information and much much more is contained within the the flash thread I am sure.
Edited by digger, 10 November 2008 - 09:56 AM.
Phew that was close.