Maltese Ripple fired shells
#1
Posted 09 November 2008 - 10:44 AM
The advantage of the technique is that it's extremely quick and simple to implement in the field. Basically the quickmatch shell leader is snipped and bared and fed into the tube next to it so that it takes fire at the time that shell lifts. You should then waterproof the tubes by pasting over foil tape individually. (ie don't lay strips of tape over more than one tube at a time.)
One possible modification of this technique is that I think bare-ing the leader may not required. This should cut down on simultaneous lifts of two adjacent tubes, but may result in the sequence halting.
I tried this technique last week and this is the results.
http://uk.youtube.co...h?v=Qv3KZ6uQK9s
Can anybody spot any flaws with this technique? I've had a think myself and cannot spot anything obvious but I reckon it should have more people to analyse......
Thoughts?
#2
Posted 09 November 2008 - 11:49 AM
So shell no 1 in a rack is fired normally, and to get a half second delay on shell no 2 the end of the match leader to shell no 2 is bared and poked down into the mortar tube of shell No 1.
The lift from shell No 1 lights the leader of No2. And this is repeated along the rack.
Is that correct?
#3
Posted 09 November 2008 - 11:50 AM
I done this with upto 50 shells! real proper machine gun effect, its Awsome!
#4
Posted 09 November 2008 - 12:04 PM
Some American firers in the past have used "Buckets". These are thin paper tubes about 2.5 inches long and 1 inch dia. These give a delay.
They are hard to explain but basically there are short lengths of match running along the length of a mortar rack between the shells. Where each shell leader comes out of the mortar tube one of these buckets is tied.
The match is tied into each end of the tube but an airspace is left so the flame has to flash over. This gives a delay. The shell leader is then poked through a hole made in the side of the tube half way along its length.
I haven't used this method but I believe that you can adjust the delay by changing the length of the "Bucket" tube.
I forgot to add that visco is sometimes used between buckets. This explains it far better than I can. Look about 2/3rds down the page.
http://www.pyrosocie...st=0#entry51491
I did try adding a diagram to this but it was pants when I submitted my post..
Edited by Mortartube, 09 November 2008 - 12:10 PM.
#5
Posted 09 November 2008 - 12:16 PM
Sounds good. I think I know what you mean but I would like to clarify.
So shell no 1 in a rack is fired normally, and to get a half second delay on shell no 2 the end of the match leader to shell no 2 is bared and poked down into the mortar tube of shell No 1.
The lift from shell No 1 lights the leader of No2. And this is repeated along the rack.
Is that correct?
Yup - That's the technique. Quick. Easy. Reliable as far as I can see.
I did another rack of 7 x 2½ inch shells and got a couple of tubes sim-lifting. I think that was because the quickmatch in fired the quickmatch of the next shell. (rather than the lift firing the next shells leader as intended). Not baring the leader would stop this I think
The video for that rack is here (sorry for the blurry quality. Bloody autofocus!)
http://uk.youtube.co...h?v=uUPpXna9py0
#6
Posted 09 November 2008 - 01:01 PM
#7
Posted 09 November 2008 - 08:41 PM
Click here for Cooperman435, THE online shop for chemicals, materials and tooling
Click here to email me Personally,
Click here to email Optimum Fireworks, West Yorkshire's premium Display Company
#8
Posted 09 November 2008 - 08:55 PM
not wanting to be contradictory but every shell i have ever bought (except those from MLE) have about 2-3 inches of visco inserted in to the leader as a "safety" fuse, if you cut this off altogether before splicing the 2 leaders together will give you and almost instant transfer of fire to the second leader, if you leave abouy 1/2 an inch of this visco you will get a slight delay between the 2 leaders igniting. Thats what I meant to say anyway, sorry if I wasnt too clear
#9
Posted 10 November 2008 - 01:09 AM
Edited by shell shooter man, 10 November 2008 - 01:55 AM.
#10
Posted 10 November 2008 - 08:10 AM
sorry, I wasnt looking at using the muzzle blast, just chaining the shells, I'll get me coatIn my case Iv'e very rarely seen visco in shells although I have seen it, visco is not an easy ignting fuse so I wouldnt be confident using visco and the mussle blast to light the next visco fused shell, theres plenty of ways to add delays to shells, what we are talking about Yorkie is a ripple or machine gun effect, visco wouldnt really give that effect.
#11
Posted 10 November 2008 - 03:55 PM
Click here for Cooperman435, THE online shop for chemicals, materials and tooling
Click here to email me Personally,
Click here to email Optimum Fireworks, West Yorkshire's premium Display Company
#12
Posted 10 November 2008 - 05:34 PM
#13
Posted 11 November 2008 - 12:30 AM
#14
Posted 11 November 2008 - 10:05 AM
#15
Posted 11 November 2008 - 02:42 PM
Did your method differ from mine in any way?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users