ammonium perchlorate hydroscopic ?
#1
Posted 17 February 2009 - 06:02 PM
#2
Posted 18 February 2009 - 01:07 PM
is nh4clo4 famously hydroscopic or is my garage very damp(it don't seem damp) ?
is nobody answearing because i shouldn't be messing with the stuff if i don't know about it allready ?
#3
Posted 18 February 2009 - 01:19 PM
Edited by pyrotrev, 18 February 2009 - 01:21 PM.
#4
Posted 18 February 2009 - 02:12 PM
It's slightly that way inclined I believe, but not seriously. But if you mix it with any nitrates or magnesium, you will form something that will turn into a very damp mess. BTW it's spelt HYGROSCOPIC guys.
thanks, sorry about the rubbish spelling( no spell checking thing on this this contraption ).time to try out my cunning invention!!!
thanks again ffs
#5
Posted 18 February 2009 - 04:38 PM
With regard to your second post, you should really read up about this chemical. Compositions made with it can be very shock sensetive, you must never ever contaminate it with Chlorate, and as Trev mentioned there are other considerations too. Cover all theoretical issues before any practical experimentation.
#6
Posted 18 February 2009 - 10:48 PM
Ammonium Perchlorate is more hygroscopic than Potassium Perchlorate but not massively so. Apparently it has a tendency to want to hold on to any water it absorbs but I've never attempted drying any personally.
With regard to your second post, you should really read up about this chemical. Compositions made with it can be very shock sensetive, you must never ever contaminate it with Chlorate, and as Trev mentioned there are other considerations too. Cover all theoretical issues before any practical experimentation.
thanks, i do read up a bit and certainly take note of any no no's, i think the chlorate mix can produce ammonium chlorate (correct me if i'm wrong) i know thats dodgey. but rest assured any experimentation i do is on a very small scale,and not done in the kitchen,as for reading i'm currently working through ' the dummies guide to chemistry' and 'a professionals guide to pyrotechnics' but i don't absorb information quickly!!!
thanks again ffs
#7
Posted 19 February 2009 - 01:39 PM
Edited by pyrotrev, 19 February 2009 - 01:40 PM.
#8
Posted 20 February 2009 - 01:34 AM
To be precise, pure stuff will absorb 0.19% moisture in 2 days at 80% RH. That seems to be enough to make the powder slightly clingy in my experience, though it doesn't affect the burning as far as I can see. One other incompatibility to watch out for is reaction with transition metals to form the corresponding perchlorates which are meant to be pretty dodgy substances when dry
do you mean the actual metal or the compounds?
ffs
#9
Posted 20 February 2009 - 12:56 PM
The salts as well.do you mean the actual metal or the compounds?
ffs
#10
Posted 20 February 2009 - 01:19 PM
Edited by pyrotrev, 20 February 2009 - 01:21 PM.
#11
Posted 20 February 2009 - 02:12 PM
used for sundry preparations, and especially for experimental
fire-works."
Dr. James Cutbush
#12
Posted 21 February 2009 - 06:42 PM
chemical they are working with? As little as 0.25% by weight can pretty much stop all caking/clumping effects.
#13
Posted 21 February 2009 - 10:11 PM
ffs
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users