Jump to content


Photo

ammonium perchlorate hydroscopic ?


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 fruitfulsteve

fruitfulsteve

    Member

  • UKPS Members
  • 1,079 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 06:02 PM

is nh4clo4 famously hydroscopic or is my garage very damp(it don't seem damp) ?
Yo Ho Ho, a pyro's life for me

#2 fruitfulsteve

fruitfulsteve

    Member

  • UKPS Members
  • 1,079 posts

Posted 18 February 2009 - 01:07 PM

is nh4clo4 famously hydroscopic or is my garage very damp(it don't seem damp) ?


is nobody answearing because i shouldn't be messing with the stuff if i don't know about it allready ?
Yo Ho Ho, a pyro's life for me

#3 pyrotrev

pyrotrev

    Pyro Forum Top Trump

  • UKPS Members
  • 1,112 posts

Posted 18 February 2009 - 01:19 PM

It's slightly that way inclined I believe, but not seriously. But if you mix it with any nitrates or magnesium, you will form something that will turn into a very damp mess. BTW it's spelt HYGROSCOPIC guys.

Edited by pyrotrev, 18 February 2009 - 01:21 PM.

Trying to do something very beautiful but very dangerous very safely....

#4 fruitfulsteve

fruitfulsteve

    Member

  • UKPS Members
  • 1,079 posts

Posted 18 February 2009 - 02:12 PM

It's slightly that way inclined I believe, but not seriously. But if you mix it with any nitrates or magnesium, you will form something that will turn into a very damp mess. BTW it's spelt HYGROSCOPIC guys.


thanks, sorry about the rubbish spelling( no spell checking thing on this this contraption ).time to try out my cunning invention!!!
thanks again ffs
Yo Ho Ho, a pyro's life for me

#5 Creepin_pyro

Creepin_pyro

    Pyro Forum Top Trump

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,198 posts

Posted 18 February 2009 - 04:38 PM

Ammonium Perchlorate is more hygroscopic than Potassium Perchlorate but not massively so. Apparently it has a tendency to want to hold on to any water it absorbs but I've never attempted drying any personally.

With regard to your second post, you should really read up about this chemical. Compositions made with it can be very shock sensetive, you must never ever contaminate it with Chlorate, and as Trev mentioned there are other considerations too. Cover all theoretical issues before any practical experimentation.

#6 fruitfulsteve

fruitfulsteve

    Member

  • UKPS Members
  • 1,079 posts

Posted 18 February 2009 - 10:48 PM

Ammonium Perchlorate is more hygroscopic than Potassium Perchlorate but not massively so. Apparently it has a tendency to want to hold on to any water it absorbs but I've never attempted drying any personally.

With regard to your second post, you should really read up about this chemical. Compositions made with it can be very shock sensetive, you must never ever contaminate it with Chlorate, and as Trev mentioned there are other considerations too. Cover all theoretical issues before any practical experimentation.


thanks, i do read up a bit and certainly take note of any no no's, i think the chlorate mix can produce ammonium chlorate (correct me if i'm wrong) i know thats dodgey. but rest assured any experimentation i do is on a very small scale,and not done in the kitchen,as for reading i'm currently working through ' the dummies guide to chemistry' and 'a professionals guide to pyrotechnics' but i don't absorb information quickly!!!
thanks again ffs
Yo Ho Ho, a pyro's life for me

#7 pyrotrev

pyrotrev

    Pyro Forum Top Trump

  • UKPS Members
  • 1,112 posts

Posted 19 February 2009 - 01:39 PM

To be precise, pure stuff will absorb 0.19% moisture in 2 days at 80% RH. That seems to be enough to make the powder slightly clingy in my experience, though it doesn't affect the burning as far as I can see. One other incompatibility to watch out for is reaction with transition metals to form the corresponding perchlorates which are meant to be pretty dodgy substances when dry :ph34r:

Edited by pyrotrev, 19 February 2009 - 01:40 PM.

Trying to do something very beautiful but very dangerous very safely....

#8 fruitfulsteve

fruitfulsteve

    Member

  • UKPS Members
  • 1,079 posts

Posted 20 February 2009 - 01:34 AM

To be precise, pure stuff will absorb 0.19% moisture in 2 days at 80% RH. That seems to be enough to make the powder slightly clingy in my experience, though it doesn't affect the burning as far as I can see. One other incompatibility to watch out for is reaction with transition metals to form the corresponding perchlorates which are meant to be pretty dodgy substances when dry :ph34r:


do you mean the actual metal or the compounds?
ffs
Yo Ho Ho, a pyro's life for me

#9 spanner

spanner

    Member

  • General Public Members
  • PipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 20 February 2009 - 12:56 PM

do you mean the actual metal or the compounds?
ffs

The salts as well.

#10 pyrotrev

pyrotrev

    Pyro Forum Top Trump

  • UKPS Members
  • 1,112 posts

Posted 20 February 2009 - 01:19 PM

Aye, both salts and the more reactive metals as well I guess. I know for sure that copper will react with AP, and I suspect uncoated iron would as well.

Edited by pyrotrev, 20 February 2009 - 01:21 PM.

Trying to do something very beautiful but very dangerous very safely....

#11 Potassium chlorate

Potassium chlorate

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 596 posts

Posted 20 February 2009 - 02:12 PM

All salts soluble in water are probably somewhat hygroscopic. If they can dissolve in water, they're probably inclined to absorb it from the air. Very simple and not scientific theory, but it seems logical.
"This salt, formerly called hyperoxymuriate of potassa, is
used for sundry preparations, and especially for experimental
fire-works."

Dr. James Cutbush

#12 E-tech

E-tech

    New Member

  • General Public Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

Posted 21 February 2009 - 06:42 PM

Just considering the 'clumping' problem that the dampness can cause. Has anyone tried mixing something like Cab-O-Sil into the
chemical they are working with? As little as 0.25% by weight can pretty much stop all caking/clumping effects.

#13 fruitfulsteve

fruitfulsteve

    Member

  • UKPS Members
  • 1,079 posts

Posted 21 February 2009 - 10:11 PM

i have now transfered mine to a new jar and put some silica with indicator in the lid i'll keep you posted!!
ffs
Yo Ho Ho, a pyro's life for me




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users