
Tiger Tail Star
#16
Posted 12 January 2004 - 10:19 PM
Possibly your stars were encouraged to break up by having a "core" to burn from where you poked them?
I had had one interesting idea that could make use of this. The over-bound star comp could be rolled on grain BP cores. This, in theory, would make a dim orange star that would then break up into a cloud of fire dust. Kind of like a crossette. I'll try this, possibly next weekend, and see if the cloud has a silver lining, or if it's just shiney nickel. (Unless I end up with a bowl of scum and glued up cores, as with most of my previous attempts at star rolling).
#17
Posted 13 January 2004 - 04:12 AM
To me they have a brighter, more lively but shorter effect than the charcoal willows
I shot a 4" lampblack willow ball shell using about 1/2 inch rolled stars(messy messy stuff)
It made a realy thick ball of sparks but NO willowing.
still testing but I added something like 10% AF charcoal straght to my lampblack comp sucessfuly slowing burn rate and adding more sparks
I have a batch of brilliant white to NEW lampblack stars that ended up at 3/4
to 1inch in diameter. I still need to shoot ashell of these, I will post details.
Note* I also have batches of blue to red, firefly to white, neon blue, and zinc spreader stars ready to be assembled into shells sitting in my shed(not good)
Ya i need to get on that, talk to you all later
Marcus
#18
Posted 13 January 2004 - 04:16 AM
I am going to try it out on my next day off..oh hey thats tomoro!
If what i hear is true, it sounds like all my problems might be solved
Marcus
#19
Posted 13 January 2004 - 07:41 AM
#20
Posted 13 January 2004 - 07:49 PM
Steve
#21
Posted 14 January 2004 - 08:05 PM
Sounds to me like this whole thread is about "Driven in" Stars. Yes Too Much Binder can cause a star to be driven in, I.E; Hard Exterior, Still wet inside. A bigger problem with Charcoal Stars of any type because the Charcoal holds water alot longer.Perhaps they build up a layer of hard dextrin on the exterior which prevents the interior drying well enough. Maybe if you used cut instead of rolled stars you could cut them in half again to product two, dry stars.
Shimizu used nearly exclusively SGRS for a binder, most of the "Modern" day hobbyist's use Dextrin. Which is a double whammy.
IMHO - Don't use anywhere near as much dextrin as called for in most formulas, 4% being my personal top for Charcoal Based Stars. Use SGRS if you have it, It is superior in every way as a binder for "Most" Stars.
When rolling, don't do it all at once, Build your cores up to no bigger than 3/8ths of an inch AND LET THEM DRY! This is the biggest mistake I made in the begining ( I was Rolling 7/8ths to 1" stars for 8" shells all in one shot!) Which of course looked great and but burned all the way to the ground and then some (Willow or Firefly)
Do not try to force them to dry, (I.E; Fan, Oven Etc, as you will only compound the problem of the surface of the star "Skinning" over and not being able to release the water the charcoal is holding. Lampblack is notoriously slow drying, so Roll or cut those a month in advance of when you think your gonna need them.
Regards, Stay Green,
Bear
Check Out My E-Bay Auctions !!
#22
Posted 15 January 2004 - 05:28 PM
Like I said to Pyromaster2003, I don't _think_ they were driven in, as they seemed dry inside, were rock hard, and it seemed to affect even very small stars. However, many of the star batches suffering from this were force dried and all were high in dextrin, so the conditions would have been right to cause them to be DI, so I'll avoid force drying in future, and keeping to 4% or less of dextrin is my general rule anyway.
#23
Posted 14 August 2004 - 02:22 PM
.1 . is to Ball Mill for a long Time Bill ofca mentions 20 Hours? David Blesser says 12hrs., then dampen the mix and granulate then ball mill the Granules to 100 to 200 mesh
.2. Use the CIA method lots of water to dissolve the KNO3 to saturate the pores of the Charcoal?..This method is used in Tom Perigrins Book IPP
I have been reading posts from various sources on the Net and im not sure which is the best? MortarTube mentions using 10% water But the formula i have read uses 20%?..I like the sound of Pheonixs method of dissolving the Nitrate in water to saturate the carbon particles.. Has any 1 tried both methods to see which works best?..
>I have got a batch in the ball mill total run time 18 hours and am about to reload and do another batch but not sure if i should use the CIA method instead..After that i got some willow Comp any Tricks way to make that?
#24
Posted 14 August 2004 - 04:50 PM
#25
Posted 14 August 2004 - 06:50 PM
Tiger Tail being roughly half Charcoal is quite hard to dry out and has so little Sulfur it can be harder to ignite than other charcoal streamers. (Not saying it is hard to ignite, just relatively harder than C6 but perhaps not as bad as some lampblacks, being oxygen deficient it actually likes hard breaks but more sulfur helps IMO).
Because you have to mill the hell out of it, Tiger Tail can be harder to roll than somewhat rougher compositions. C6 needs to be milled well too, but you *can* get away with just screening it, dampening, grating through a fine sieve a few times then either rolling or pumping. Such a primitive technique produces a slower drossy star, but is still acceptable if you are lazy or ball mill challenged.
You can always use the same fine granulation trick to make fully milled charcoal and lampblack stars easier to roll too. I like it, I hate rolling 'talcum powder' compositions, they spike the stars and stick to the walls and make the process more dusty than it needs to be. I am really hopeless at rolling stars, so every little bit of luck on my side helps.
I like pumping slightly 'grainy' charcoal crossettes too, they are easier to get off the pump. They might even be easier to break, but I haven't had a lot of luck breaking them yet

http://www.vk2zay.net/
#26
Posted 15 August 2004 - 12:42 PM
BTW: Igniting this star will not be an issue. I've never seen one go blind.
#27
Posted 15 August 2004 - 03:52 PM
.I am using Pine charcoal to make the Tiger Tail and burnt a small pile,it burns fairly slowly with lots of orange sparks which dont spray outwards but float straight up in the air with the smoke. and leaves a lot of black unburnt charcoal residue but i expect that when its being blown out of a shell it will all be burnt up.
#28
Posted 15 August 2004 - 07:49 PM
#29
Posted 30 August 2004 - 11:05 PM
..I have not Primed them and im going to try whistle mix and then Flash on BP coated Rice Crispies (750 g BP on 150 g Crispies) to break the shells. I may use 6" shell but more likley use 4" because i dont think i have enough BP coated RiceCrispies to make 2 6" shells ..This is my first test with tigertail so dont know how it should perform? So here is a video clip of some stars i fired ..Tiger Tail 3 Clips How do they look? the test were done in very strong wind so that may have effected the Tail But i was hoping for a much longer tail...How do you create a longer tail? add larger mesh charcoal?
...The video doesnt pick up how Fine the sparks were..They were fired out of a 3/4" inner diameter cardboard tube using 1 teaspoon(5ml) of 4 to 10 mesh BP 2FG? and the stars were simply dropped in the tube...
#30
Posted 31 August 2004 - 08:01 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users