chlorate rocket header
#16
Posted 15 November 2009 - 02:15 AM
I love a good bang (dont get me wrong!) Working with BP is far more enjoyable, nothing like a thick BP putty that looks good enough to eat!
www.illusionfireworks.com - A SKY FULL OF MAGIC!
#17
Posted 15 November 2009 - 12:06 PM
now one thing i will say before anyone asks this never involves anything other than plastic shells and pasting or cardboard tubes and pasting.
that being said i am interested to see what result can be got from very fast BP has anyone managed to get comparable results?
#18
Posted 15 November 2009 - 12:55 PM
You may want to invest in some 3-ply Italian flax twine - perfect for all your spiking needs!
Even with a hastily thrown-together wrap of kraft, a little spiking will go a long way.
With the right confinement straight meal will work fine. I believe the Germans like to use grained BP glazed with dark Aluminium to pack an extra punch. Their military battlefield simulators are absolutely amazing.
#19
Posted 15 November 2009 - 03:32 PM
A string-bound maroon will indeed make a most satisfying report, with no flash needed.
You may want to invest in some 3-ply Italian flax twine - perfect for all your spiking needs!
Even with a hastily thrown-together wrap of kraft, a little spiking will go a long way.
With the right confinement straight meal will work fine. I believe the Germans like to use grained BP glazed with dark Aluminium to pack an extra punch. Their military battlefield simulators are absolutely amazing.
what grain size would be used i use about 2mm for lift would that be to big.
also the Al, do they just shake the BP in Al powder or do they wet the Bp slightly and shake it. what method do they use?
i have recently spiked a Ti salute with cotton string,the same string i use for my BM. this was saturated in PVA. this gave a very nice report. but they was FP based, i will try BP next.
one thing i would like to add, i know i am again talking about salutes, but this is just because this thread was started again. I'm more interested in getting things like hummers and more visual effect right than salutes. which I'm sure most will agree is a welcome step forward.
#20
Posted 15 November 2009 - 05:42 PM
#21
Posted 15 November 2009 - 06:09 PM
also will a coating make it take fire easier or harder. i was thinking harder?
#22
Posted 15 November 2009 - 11:34 PM
#23
Posted 15 November 2009 - 11:55 PM
#24
Posted 16 November 2009 - 08:42 PM
You may want to invest in some 3-ply Italian flax twine - perfect for all your spiking needs!
I would be interested in getting some of this twine,any pointers where from?
#25
Posted 17 November 2009 - 09:38 AM
Salutes tend to be the favored devices of the mad bombers and morons, simply out for the noise and destruction. They are simply interested in big booms without any respect for the art or knowledge of the hobby.
While this is true in many cases, some individuals are actually interested in the science of explosions. When you look beyond the basics of the hobby of pyrotechnics, there are entire knowledge bases that can be applied to each individual effect. I make lots of salutes; not because I'm a moron or a mad bomber, but because I am interested in the physics of sound and pressure, reaction mechanisms that effect the burn rate of compositions, the effects of casing geometry on internal salute pressure, etc. Being able to utilize this knowledge and produce a louder or more brisant salute is quite satisfying. I also enjoy many other aspects of the hobby, but I feel that it's unfair to label everyone who enjoys salutes as a mad bomber and/or moron.
As for the original post, a rocket launch is unlikely to set off even sensitive Chlorate compositions. Still, I would seriously advise against using Chlorates in flash, especially when you have an equivalent Perchlorate salt available.
Edited by CanadianPyro, 17 November 2009 - 09:41 AM.
#26
Posted 17 November 2009 - 12:29 PM
While this is true in many cases, some individuals are actually interested in the science of explosions. When you look beyond the basics of the hobby of pyrotechnics, there are entire knowledge bases that can be applied to each individual effect. I make lots of salutes; not because I'm a moron or a mad bomber, but because I am interested in the physics of sound and pressure, reaction mechanisms that effect the burn rate of compositions, the effects of casing geometry on internal salute pressure, etc. Being able to utilize this knowledge and produce a louder or more brisant salute is quite satisfying. I also enjoy many other aspects of the hobby, but I feel that it's unfair to label everyone who enjoys salutes as a mad bomber and/or moron.
As for the original post, a rocket launch is unlikely to set off even sensitive Chlorate compositions. Still, I would seriously advise against using Chlorates in flash, especially when you have an equivalent Perchlorate salt available.
thanks for that comment, its good to hear that from someone more experienced than myself. thats where my mind set has been, but i didn't want to make that point because i felt it could be arrogant to do so without the experience to back it up.
the reason i originally asked is because there are dozens of chlorate report comps on thegreenmans site and having tried one some time ago it gave a very deep report, compared to the KCLO4/Al in the same tube making more of a crack. although alot of these call for mixing sulfur and chlorate which of course is a no no.
name Flash Thunder #2
Potassium chlorate 43
Antimony trisulfide 26
Aluminum, dark pyro 31
thegreenman
Edited by CCH Concepts, 17 November 2009 - 12:32 PM.
#27
Posted 17 November 2009 - 08:12 PM
Adding Antimony Trisulfide to any composition is dangerous, and significantly increases the composition's sensitivity to electrostatic discharge. The crystals are conductive and shaped like very small, extremely thin needles, so only a very small amount of current is required to heat them to the ignition temperature of the comp. It's analogous to using 24 gauge wire on an arc welder.
You may also want to look into Nitrate flash, as such comps tend to burn more slowly and produce deeper bangs than the equivalent (Close to stoichiometric) Chlorate/Perchlorate versions.
#28
Posted 17 November 2009 - 08:54 PM
#29
Posted 17 November 2009 - 10:06 PM
my thought was that if the pressure wave is moving slower then there more chance of a uniform break on the case rather than it breaching on a weak point.
It's actually the opposite. If the pressure builds more slowly, the casing will tend to fail at its weakest point, and release all of the gas through that small opening. That's why relatively slow burning compositions like black powder can fire a shell into the air without blowing up the mortar.
With fast flash powder, the gas is generated so quickly that the inertia of the end plugs is sufficient to keep them in place while the internal salute pressure continues to rise well above the failure pressure of the plugs. Fast flash powder can be used in thick-tubed salutes with paper thin end plugs, and still produce a uniform burst of the tube, even if its failure pressure is many times higher than that of the end plugs.
#30
Posted 18 November 2009 - 12:32 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users