Homemade ball mill - is coke bottle ok to use?
#1
Posted 05 December 2003 - 10:58 PM
I've decided that I'm going to make my own ball mill as 5 minutes in the old mortar and pestle just doesn't cut it.
The only thing I'm concerned about is what to use for the jar. I was thinking that a coke bottle might be enough?
The only problem I thought about was that it might create static?
I presume it won't wear down with just lead balls in it.
Oh and I'm sorry if this has been discussed before but I searched for it and couldn't find anything.
#2
Posted 06 December 2003 - 12:00 AM
#3
Posted 06 December 2003 - 08:28 AM
Stuart
Edited by Stuart, 06 December 2003 - 08:30 AM.
#4
Posted 06 December 2003 - 09:13 AM
Won't wear down? It won't survive more then 10 minutes mate you need something much stronger.
I've decided that I'm going to make my own ball mill as 5 minutes in the old mortar and pestle just doesn't cut it.
The only thing I'm concerned about is what to use for the jar. I was thinking that a coke bottle might be enough?
The only problem I thought about was that it might create static?
I presume it won't wear down with just lead balls in it.
Oh and I'm sorry if this has been discussed before but I searched for it and couldn't find anything.
#5
Posted 11 December 2003 - 05:29 AM
The e-motor with reduction gear (about 90 rpm) is from ebay costs were about 10 Euro.
#6
Posted 11 December 2003 - 08:57 AM
#7
Posted 11 December 2003 - 05:40 PM
#8
Posted 11 December 2003 - 06:43 PM
Yes copper is a good heat conductor. So what? The heat generated by the milling action get's dissipated quickly by the large area of the copper pipe.
Shrapnell: Have you ever seen a metal pipe destroyed by an black powder explosion? I guess not. Copper especially is a soft and tough metall, if it blows up it will look more like a peeled banana, there would be very little shrapnell. Anyway, I wouldn't want to stand near it.
Even the old type handgrenades with a cast iron body ( pineapple and mills charge type) and a high explosive filler had serious problems with breaking up in many shrapnells. Their shrapnell distribution was poor, this is why they were replaced with modern prenotched types.
Why copper would make the 'most dangerous shrapnell' escapes me.
Edited by tomu, 11 December 2003 - 07:04 PM.
#9
Posted 11 December 2003 - 07:52 PM
As it stands ? and I have no problems to stand corrected ? I have NEVER seen a mill jar made out of copper. Also, nobody uses copper for milling media. I also believe it has to do something with chemical reaction between copper and other chemicals ? but I?ll be happy to dig more into the issue.
#10
Posted 11 December 2003 - 08:13 PM
The ideal material in my opinion for a 'safe' milling jar would be HDPE with end plugs designed to readily give way in the unlikely event of an explosion, which at worst would merely 'bell out' instead of fracturing the jar.
#11
Posted 11 December 2003 - 11:08 PM
I'm gonna have to side with Big on this one. Copper just seems odd if nothing else. It's also a very soft metal and I would expect it to wear poorly.
Not very scientific sounding but....would you rather get bonked over the head with a plastic pipe or a copper one.
The lesser of the two evils is most certainly the hdpe. If copper was really all that great they would use it to shoot shells out of.
Another way to look at the thing is to use a somewhat weak walled plastic mill jar and if it ever does go the confinement aspect is a good thing in this case. When the jar starts to look worn just throw it out and replace it with a fresh one.
Tomu, be safe.
A very interesting discussion.
Edited by bernie, 11 December 2003 - 11:09 PM.
#12
Posted 11 December 2003 - 11:22 PM
-Matt
#13
Posted 11 December 2003 - 11:31 PM
#14
Posted 11 December 2003 - 11:57 PM
#15
Posted 12 December 2003 - 01:04 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users