A few days ago I have tried to make some flitter stars. The composition is given below: KNO3 : 40% CHARCOAL : 20% SULFUR : 10% MAGNESIUM : 15% (200 mesh) DEXTRIN : 5% Make pumped or cut stars of 2-3mm ,dry well in sunlight, and fill in to the shell. Adding 5% extra dextrin makes the stars long lasting. The stars come out with beautiful golden tail which is more beautiful than any charcoal fire dust of Shimizu or so. Adding extra 5% of 200-300 mesh dark pyro aluminium makes the stars more bright. The composition is solely of my brainchild.I would be happy if you like it. Try the composition & mail me if you would like it.
Magnesium flitter star
#1
Posted 28 April 2010 - 02:31 AM
#2
Posted 28 April 2010 - 04:43 AM
Even if you had success with the batch, please change it to a non-aqueous binding system. You could even leave the dex in for delay if you wanted....
Usually a small batch that is dried really fast won't show any dangers. If you scale up that batch, or the sun isnt out and you cant dry it fast enough, it could be very disastrous!
Anyways, be safe!
Edited by al93535, 28 April 2010 - 04:45 AM.
#3
Posted 29 April 2010 - 05:05 PM
Even if you had success with the batch, please change it to a non-aqueous binding system. You could even leave the dex in for delay if you wanted....
Though eliminating the wetting step would all but eliminate the charcoal sparks...
Tamaldas, I'm sure your star is beautiful, but as Al has pointed out, the magnesium will not last long. This means that for smaller batches it will quickly loose performance, and for larger batches it could build up enough heat to auto-ignite while damp.
A better chemical for briliant sparks in nitrate compositions is Titanium, which is perfectly compatable with all the chemicals we use.
#4
Posted 29 April 2010 - 06:47 PM
Keep mannequins and watermelons away from fireworks..they always get hurt..
#5
Posted 30 April 2010 - 04:30 PM
Though eliminating the wetting step would all but eliminate the charcoal sparks...
Tamaldas, I'm sure your star is beautiful, but as Al has pointed out, the magnesium will not last long. This means that for smaller batches it will quickly loose performance, and for larger batches it could build up enough heat to auto-ignite while damp.
A better chemical for briliant sparks in nitrate compositions is Titanium, which is perfectly compatable with all the chemicals we use.
#6
Posted 30 April 2010 - 04:35 PM
seymore I haven't yet tried titanium. Next Ill get some titanium to see the effect. Thanks for replying tamaldasThough eliminating the wetting step would all but eliminate the charcoal sparks...
Tamaldas, I'm sure your star is beautiful, but as Al has pointed out, the magnesium will not last long. This means that for smaller batches it will quickly loose performance, and for larger batches it could build up enough heat to auto-ignite while damp.
A better chemical for briliant sparks in nitrate compositions is Titanium, which is perfectly compatable with all the chemicals we use.
#7
Posted 30 April 2010 - 06:35 PM
seymore I haven't yet tried titanium. Next Ill get some titanium to see the effect. Thanks for replying tamaldas
No problem
I hope you find Ti that is not too expensive!
#8
Posted 01 May 2010 - 11:12 AM
#9
Posted 01 May 2010 - 12:08 PM
Edited by rocketpro, 06 August 2010 - 10:11 AM.
Who tests the tester.
#10
Posted 01 May 2010 - 12:53 PM
would boiling the Mg wth 5% K2Cr2O7 soln for 1/2 an hr serve the purpose? tamaldasOr just coat the Magnesium with 4% linseed oil.
#11
Posted 01 May 2010 - 01:10 PM
I have tried AL fine flake but the flitter didnt come off, the whole thing burnt like a white flame. Flake Al worked well with another composition I have made NaNo3 : 37%Ti is pretty expensive as far as I am concerned and tricky to get hold of now also, especially cheap. Why dont you also try flake aluminium or just a course grade aluminium like 60 - 100 mesh etc?
BaNo3 : 25% Al fineFlake :29% S : 3% dextrin : 6% Boric acid 2% soln tomake the star
Edited by tamaldas, 01 May 2010 - 01:18 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users