Ground salute.....
#1
Posted 27 October 2010 - 07:46 PM
after gobsmacking the people who attend my yearly bonfire/fireworks last year with my firecrackers,EVERYONE who is coming this year has asked if i'll be doing the same, or something similar....
Now, noise is a integral part of fireworks for me, so i always make some ( nothing fancy, 3/4 dia tubes, 5 inch long, thick walled, Filled with Mg/Pot Nitrate 50:50), along with a small roll of micro crackers.
So, forgetting all that, i plan to make 1 ground salute to either start, or end the display. At the moment, i was planning on using a 2 4 inch shell casings - likely 1/2 filled with the above flash compostion. I favour it for being easy to mix, easy to ignite, LOUD, and ( relativly ) safe.
now, obviously taping up shell casings with flash inside : a - won't be easy, and B : won't be safe.
for that reason, i wonder if i would be safer using a plastic container - with the flash being mixed ( in small batches ) on site, 30 mins before use......Im open to suggestions, and also keen to know what the industry standard is.
Thanks in advance.
#2
Posted 27 October 2010 - 09:36 PM
If you use a small ziploc bag, you can simply put it into the shell case when the mixing is done and ignite it with a spolette or some kind of safety fuse, without opening the bag again.
used for sundry preparations, and especially for experimental
fire-works."
Dr. James Cutbush
#3
Posted 27 October 2010 - 09:44 PM
When I mix more than a few grams of flash, I do it in a closed ziploc bag with antistatic spray on my hands and the bag.
If you use a small ziploc bag, you can simply put it into the shell case when the mixing is done and ignite it with a spolette or some kind of safety fuse, without opening the bag again.
really - even with pot. nitrate+ Mg.....I'd have thought the introduction of ANY plastics was a concern for static........then again, i remember a video of someone mixing 200g of perc/al flash in a bag.....
#4
Posted 27 October 2010 - 09:50 PM
This is probably the least dangerous way to mix it.
Edited by helix, 27 October 2010 - 09:51 PM.
#5
Posted 27 October 2010 - 09:59 PM
If your just making one why don't you use the binary method? and just add the mg/ KNO3 unmixed, tape up the shell and then roll/ shake the contents for a couple of minutes to mix the contents.
This is probably the least dangerous way to mix it.
I was thinking about that too.
Seems safer than mixing 10 batches by diaper, then trying to seal a shell.
#6
Posted 27 October 2010 - 10:23 PM
PS I've never tried it personally as I really have no where I could fire a ground salute that size without drawing a serious amount of unwanted attention - as it will be seriously loud.
#7
Posted 27 October 2010 - 10:33 PM
It'll be set of ON the ground, not in a frame. 40 second fuse, to allow safe retreat to 40 metres.
#8
Posted 27 October 2010 - 11:00 PM
Click here for Cooperman435, THE online shop for chemicals, materials and tooling
Click here to email me Personally,
Click here to email Optimum Fireworks, West Yorkshire's premium Display Company
#9
Posted 28 October 2010 - 06:47 AM
Id advise against it ON the ground as it can lift dirt and propell it at high speed everywhere, just an old rocket stick to lift it about a foot or more into the air for safety
I thought about that too - wouldnt you be concerned the old rocket stick became a projectile ???
#10
Posted 28 October 2010 - 08:43 AM
Click here for Cooperman435, THE online shop for chemicals, materials and tooling
Click here to email me Personally,
Click here to email Optimum Fireworks, West Yorkshire's premium Display Company
#11
Posted 28 October 2010 - 09:00 AM
When I mix more than a few grams of flash, I do it in a closed ziploc bag with antistatic spray on my hands and the bag.
If you use a small ziploc bag, you can simply put it into the shell case when the mixing is done and ignite it with a spolette or some kind of safety fuse, without opening the bag again.
You're crazy or what? Yeah, let's throw some flash in a baggy.. The small Al particles wont rub each other to generate static el, the plastic baggy isn't going to make it even FAR worse. DAMN
Just diaper your flash, screen it or use the binary method. Don't shake it if you use the binary method, the handling itself will mix the ingredients (poorly..).
Spherical shell casing's suck for salute, you can better make a can shell like one. And follow Cooperman's instructions on the stick .
#12
Posted 28 October 2010 - 11:10 AM
Do be carefully with flash mate it only takes 1 accident and your hands are gone, and with the quanitity your likly to have it will damage you serverly may even kill you so be very cautious. I dont no much about nitrate flash but if its not too far away from my mix then its extremely dangerous, so much i refuse to make anymore than a 10 gram batch at any one time even then ime bricking myself with my welders gloves on, mask ear muffs and thick clothing.
Maybe you could do a video of this for us?
#13
Posted 28 October 2010 - 12:09 PM
When mixing "standard" 70/30 Perc-Al flash the addition of 1% fine graphite powder reduces the mechanical sensitivity drastically, with little to no impact on the performance.
Mix the graphite in with the Perc first, and then add the Al and mix by your chosen method (diapering / ziploc etc)
It's a good cheap way to cut the risk factors down - I never mix without it personally.
#14
Posted 28 October 2010 - 12:57 PM
Top Tip!
When mixing "standard" 70/30 Perc-Al flash the addition of 1% fine graphite powder reduces the mechanical sensitivity drastically, with little to no impact on the performance.
Mix the graphite in with the Perc first, and then add the Al and mix by your chosen method (diapering / ziploc etc)
It's a good cheap way to cut the risk factors down - I never mix without it personally.
Could you elaborate on this, how exactly does it reduce the risk and so forth as i dont really understand the chemistry of it all. Also i dont use the standard 70/30 mix i use 2/1 ratio little different to the 70/30 but will the graphite still work?
Anything to reduce risk mate as ime petrified of the stuff.
#15
Posted 28 October 2010 - 01:48 PM
The reason it acts as a lubricant is that graphite is made up of sheets of carbon atoms arranged in layers (NB a single sheet of carbon atoms is known as "graphene"). The bonds between the layers are very weak and thus can easily slide over each other.
You can experiment yourself with this. Take a softish pencil and use it to completly shade in an area on a sheet of paper. Now take your finger and rub it over the shaded part. You should find it much smoother than the unshaded paper. (pencil "lead" is basically graphite, with some binders)
Add to this the fact that graphite conducts electricity and you have something that not only reduces mechanical sensitivity but also cuts down on the static risk
Neat huh?
Edited by RegimentalPyro, 28 October 2010 - 01:50 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users