Who did the London NYE fireworks?
#31
Posted 03 January 2012 - 08:44 PM
#32
Posted 03 January 2012 - 08:47 PM
Richard my post which I believe was post 7 is being hidden I cannot understand why, maybe you could PM me to enlighten me please?
Should be able to see it now.
#33 Guest_PyroPDC_*
Posted 03 January 2012 - 08:56 PM
"the owners of this forum and their parties are in no-way legally liable for any actions that are either directly or indirectly related to any material stored on this forum or its retrieval systems."
Edited by PyroPDC, 03 January 2012 - 08:57 PM.
#34
Posted 03 January 2012 - 09:09 PM
what i wrote was taken out of context
It would appear that more than one party read your posting in a very similar way
#35
Posted 03 January 2012 - 09:42 PM
It seems that Kimbolton doesn't like bad publicity and are using bully boy tactics to me.
It did come across as a libellious remark about an incident well in the past. I don't think anbody likes bad publicity.
www.illusionfireworks.com - A SKY FULL OF MAGIC!
#37
Posted 03 January 2012 - 10:10 PM
why are they even interested in a members comment on a small pyro forum its not exactly the national press is it?It did come across as a libellious remark about an incident well in the past. I don't think anbody likes bad publicity.
#38
Posted 04 January 2012 - 07:25 AM
UKPS is not a small fireworks forum, bear in mind the part the society is playing in the design of certain explosive leglislation.
Edited by Masterchief, 04 January 2012 - 07:27 AM.
www.illusionfireworks.com - A SKY FULL OF MAGIC!
#39 Guest_PyroPDC_*
Posted 04 January 2012 - 12:09 PM
in google the ukps is fireworks manufacture related so i dont think kimbolton have to worry.
just recently there has been a rather bad press about the M5 firework accident and from what iv read the firework company was not guilty but with the bad publicity do you think the london Olympics would allow them to do the fireworks ??
hence my comment about kimbolton, i am no way pointing out there competence or anything (as i am a tiny dot compared to them) but mealy stating getting a major contract like that is bloody hard to get and you can never get rid of mark like that on your safety record just because the fines / court costs ect have been paid.
Edited by PyroPDC, 04 January 2012 - 12:10 PM.
#40
Posted 04 January 2012 - 04:19 PM
I post as an individual, not as a business
c'mon, really?
#41 Guest_PyroPDC_*
Posted 04 January 2012 - 04:52 PM
there's a reason why big firework company dont post or even hide behind fake forum names, something im only starting to learn because your not allowed an opinion or say anything if you own a business.
#42
Posted 04 January 2012 - 06:25 PM
because your not allowed an opinion or say anything if you own a business
It's called professional integrity, you not only represent your business but the industry too (at least in the eyes of the general public)
I think your wrong in saying UKPS is dedicated to the manufacture of pyrotechnics, if so 60% of its forum topics are defunct.
One of the UKPS' aims is to 'To support the UK fireworks industry as a whole'.
Some opinions should perhaps be kept to ourselves, bitching between each other, other companies and their contracts isn't getting anybody anywhere, so
www.illusionfireworks.com - A SKY FULL OF MAGIC!
#43
Posted 04 January 2012 - 08:30 PM
#44
Posted 04 January 2012 - 08:38 PM
#45
Posted 04 January 2012 - 11:58 PM
Guess the big boys always attract this type of rubishing and they will be used to it, for you to suggest they got this contract through business ties is beyond me.
Its very sad.
Quote: I don`t know for sure, but I believe some of these GLA tenders/contracts run for a period of a few years = thats probably why Kimbolton seem to be heading up these big events more & more in recent times, that said, and what with Boris being a Tory mayor and the Ron`s son being an Tory MP should we not be surprised?
OMG, are you serious? why would it be beyond you?
Firstly I have not rubished anyone, secondly I have not suggested any improper behaviour between the persons I mentioned, I am merely suggesting that having common goals or ideals can often have benificial effects (giving that company or persons the edge in perhaps getting the contract), this could come in the form of say belonging to a relevant trade association, business club, political party, taking someone out to lunch etc etc, in essence they call this NETWORKING! which is not illegal and common practice in every day society, that said, this is only a small part of the picture.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users