Jump to content


Photo

Ring Shell Rockets


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 Phoenix

Phoenix

    UKR Forum Ex Regular!

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 544 posts

Posted 04 February 2004 - 09:40 PM

Has anyone ever seen these things go? They are pretty neat. My sailing club had some at their bonfire night display. Obviously, I couldn't investigate their construction in any detail there and then, since they weren't my rockets. However, this much I could tell from looking at the outside and watching them go:

- The heading was a 40-50mm ball shell (I don't carry callipers)
- It was pasted with strips of kraft paper. Could have been paper or plastic hemis.
- The break was very quiet, just a muffled pop.
- There was no visible flash from the break. Didn't look like flash powder.
- They produced a completely circular ring of stars.

Their performance surprised me, as I was under the impression regular breaks from small shells were very difficult. The break was, however, completely round, every time. A powerful burst charge and weaker casing would presumably help facilitate this. Whilst the quiet burst backed up the weak casing theory, the lack of a bright flash suggested to me that flash powder was not the burst charge. I am doubtful that black powder could produce this quality of break in so small a shell, so I suspect the burst charge may have been H3 (would this, as a chlorate comp, be allowed in consumer fireworks?). My attempt at a similarly sized (40mm) ring shell with a BP burst did not work, although I've only tried once, and I suppose, as a shell, it could have broken side on :rolleyes: Has anyone else had any luck with small ring (or other pattern) shells. Post replies in UK Pyrotechnics.

I would definitely recommend these for next year, especially if noise is going to be a concern. These are quiet, but are just as spectacular as a larger rocket, in their own way. They are also much cheaper. Apparently members of the UK Firework Review can read an article on them, but not me. Here is the American Black Cat site (American firework sites make me jealous!), as I couldn't find a UK BC site.

Black Cat "Ring Shell Rocket Pack"

Edited by Phoenix, 04 February 2004 - 09:41 PM.


#2 adamw

adamw

    An old Leodensian

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,297 posts

Posted 04 February 2004 - 10:17 PM

"- The break was very quiet, just a muffled pop."

Strange since ring shells tend to have more space occupied by burst charge and therefore a louder break. Like you said, there could have been minimal burst and the rest of the space filled with an inert medium such as cotton seed.

Personally, I am not a fan of ring shells - a waste of a shell in my opinion. Pretty much the same as making a 16" fish shell :)

But saturn shells on the otherhand.... mmmm!
75 : 15: 10... Enough said!

#3 Phoenix

Phoenix

    UKR Forum Ex Regular!

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 544 posts

Posted 05 February 2004 - 06:56 PM

I know what you mean - not a lot of visible effect for the amount of material and time required, but I was impressed as it was the first time I have seen a consumer rocket give anything more than a "dump" of stars. I would love to see more fancy break styles (not least saturn shells) in consumer fireworks, although I suppose the limits on size make this difficult. :(

PS: I guess "fancy break styles" isn't the correct term. What would Rev. Lancaster call them?

Edited by Phoenix, 05 February 2004 - 06:59 PM.


#4 italteen3

italteen3

    Newbie

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 304 posts

Posted 08 February 2004 - 05:00 AM

I actually had these rockets last 4th of July here in the states. I do kow exactly what you mean too. small rocket not a loud break but yes they were always consistent round breaks. I will get video up of them if I can. IF anyone does come across these I too would recomend them. Another good rocket pack if your more for a noisy but full break is the Vampire or Dracula rocket pack(sorry cant remember exact name) but it does come in a coffin shaped box.

#5 StfuStuf

StfuStuf

    Hardcore

  • General Public Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts

Posted 08 February 2004 - 08:30 AM

They are Vampires, I had them for Halloween. They go up really far and have round breaks, I think they whistled as well... The colours were red and white? Something like that but they were really cool.
the best bands to hear while making fireworks:exploited,distillers,rancid,billy talent, refused,sexpistols,unseen,sublime

#6 italteen3

italteen3

    Newbie

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 304 posts

Posted 18 February 2004 - 05:23 PM

Yes they are Vampires and I have video of 2 Vampire rockets and 2 Ring rockets firing simultaneously. IF any1 would like to see it post in here, PM me, or email me at crayzital3@aol.com and I will email it to you. Its not the best quality because of my computer but I am saving up for a firewire card.

#7 alany

alany

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts

Posted 18 February 2004 - 05:58 PM

Why couldn't you make a ring rocket heading out of a squat canister shell?

More like a hocky puck kind of aspect ratio, with heavy disks and vertical spiking, but fairly thin walls and no horizontal spiking. Then inside you place stars in a ring around the outside wall (maybe tacked in place with hot-melt or rolled in tissue) and pack the burst in the middle perhaps with a flash or whistle booster?

How many gores to you think you can add to a crossette core before it shatters to dust or fails to split on all of them?

#8 The_Djinn

The_Djinn

    Light Up The Sky - KF Pyro Crew

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 518 posts

Posted 18 February 2004 - 07:34 PM

Alany,

I pondered about using squat canister shells, but it appears the main cause for concern is the tumbling effect that may occur within the mortar upon firing. It appears that the line of thought is that there is a great possibility for the puck shaped shell to hang up in the mortar and flower pot? or worse (burst a perfectly good mortar tube) :(

Mark
KF Pyro Crew
BPA L1 & L2

#9 Matt

Matt

    Another Aussie Trying To take Over

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 396 posts

Posted 18 February 2004 - 11:03 PM

Pffff, thats easy. Jut stack 6 of the b*st*rds in there :rolleyes:

-Matt
Try to run! try to hide! Break on through to the other side!! YYYEEEAAAAOOHHHHHHHHAAAAHHHHHHHH

#10 bernie

bernie

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 457 posts

Posted 18 February 2004 - 11:07 PM

Stack your flapjacks on top of a rocket. A truly amazing effect!

#11 alany

alany

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts

Posted 19 February 2004 - 09:44 AM

I pondered about using squat canister shells, but it appears the main cause for concern is the tumbling effect that may occur within the mortar upon firing. It appears that the line of thought is that there is a great possibility for the puck shaped shell to hang up in the mortar and flower pot? or worse (burst a perfectly good mortar tube) :(

Yeah, that's why I'd never shoot them from a mortar, they might rotate and blow-by so much gas they'd not reach more than a few metres. However, you could stack them in a multibreak, or use them as inserts in a larger shell.

The main problem with fixing them to rockets would be their complete lack of aerodynamic features, I figure a cone wacked on top would fix that. In particular I was considering them as a stinger heading, nice and symmetric mass layout and a short profile which is ideal for stinger stability.

#12 bernie

bernie

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 457 posts

Posted 19 February 2004 - 12:39 PM

No cone necessary, it will fly.

#13 alany

alany

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts

Posted 19 February 2004 - 01:17 PM

No cone necessary, it will fly.

Yeah, but I think it will have more stability problems than a conventional canister shell header, even though top-heavy rockets are more stable.

It would be interesting to lift it girandola style though, like a flying saucer. Interesting terminating effect too, but a lot of work to make.

#14 Matt

Matt

    Another Aussie Trying To take Over

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 396 posts

Posted 19 February 2004 - 01:27 PM

The shell could be the wheel.... tie the drivers to the outside. dayum i just thought of a cannister shell idea. heh heh heh heh heh

-Matt
Try to run! try to hide! Break on through to the other side!! YYYEEEAAAAOOHHHHHHHHAAAAHHHHHHHH

#15 alany

alany

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts

Posted 19 February 2004 - 03:36 PM

Well, we will see if a rocket carries it OK:

http://nexus.cable.n...ex.php?page=151

Looks a bit weird.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users