3/4 inch core burner
#1
Posted 28 March 2012 - 06:49 PM
I would just like to say that I made my first ever core burner rocket engine this evening and performed a static test and it worked exactly as I imagined it should. Not a clue how much thrust it generated but given the way it tried to bury itself even deeper in the pant pot it was not bad at all. Big woosh, very loud and short until it hit the delay.
I'm using the tooling from oliver brown with 60:30:10 ratios of KNO3, C and S. 7 inch long thick walled tubes.
I have just rammed number 2 and am waiting for darkness for a free flight test :-)
Sorry, had to share as I'm very excited and the family just don;t get it!! !
#2
Posted 28 March 2012 - 08:51 PM
I'll try again tomorrow!
#3
Posted 28 March 2012 - 08:56 PM
I know how you are feeling right now
Did you use a top plug?
Edited by Vic, 28 March 2012 - 08:59 PM.
- dr thrust and like this
#4
Posted 29 March 2012 - 12:45 AM
#5
Posted 29 March 2012 - 01:44 PM
The top plug was almost certainly the issue as I plugged the first one but not the second. I thought it might be possible for the delay section to be strong enough to contain the pressure...clearly not.
Just out of interest...do you usually just make a small hole in this to ignite the header when I get to the point of making them?
#6
Posted 29 March 2012 - 04:09 PM
Just out of interest...do you usually just make a small hole in this to ignite the header when I get to the point of making them?
Yes, and you want it close to the side of the tube. The flame front propagating through the fuel grain will reach this point last, so all of the grain will be consumed when the header is ignited.
#7
Posted 29 March 2012 - 04:52 PM
If you aim for a 4 to 5mm passfire hole that should do the trick.
Good luck with the test,
#8
Posted 29 March 2012 - 05:17 PM
#9
Posted 29 March 2012 - 07:55 PM
Extremely fast launch, dead straight and vertical flight too.
What sort of size header can these reliably lift?
#10
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:10 PM
Wow that was even more impressive than I thought it would be!!
Extremely fast launch, dead straight and vertical flight too.
What sort of size header can these reliably lift?
200g plus headers no problem,start off smaller and build your way up,
#11
Posted 29 March 2012 - 09:17 PM
#12
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:19 PM
I'd recommend tigertail stars to get you going because they are so easy to make and easy to light, pop them in a paper hemi with a bit of rice crispy burst and you are in business!!
If you get a chance, get a video or some pictures as I'm going to add a gallery to the website soon.
#13
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:33 PM
Here's a vid of a motor test. I'd been keen on feedback about how effective it looked.
My girlfriend didn't quite manage to follow it all the way up but you can see a very strong launch. The only thing I might try is a little more delay as it burnt out very quickly compared to a previous test.
I've actually got some hand cut willow stars ready to go so I think it will be the next test :-)
#14
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:52 PM
To extend the flight time make sure you have consolidated the fuel as best as possible and make sure your top plug is right at the top of the tube and your nozzle plug is kept trim, I use 6g of clay.
This is a vid I made a whille ago, same tooling, same comp with a 3" hemi with tigertails, short delay after rocket had finished but still looks fine! ROCKET
#15
Posted 31 March 2012 - 11:52 AM
I see you used titanium in yours but I'm slightly nervous about adding metals to the comp as I'm ramming. What do people do about adding effects to the trail but safely? I was going to add some courser charcoal etc or ferro-titanium if its safer to ram than sponge titanium.
p.s. Love the gf (I presume) screaming at the woosh ;-)
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users