Tools & Equipment
#16
Posted 01 March 2004 - 08:21 PM
Seems like it wouldn't scale down very well, say to micro stars, for which Rich Wolter has a picture of a microstar plate on his site. I think I'd prefer the noodle cutter method for making microstars.
For bigger stars I'd prefer a gang pump or just rolling them. Rolling is *so* much faster when you want to make a huge batch, but I must admit I am not an expert at rolling. I have problems keeping them all the same size, I guess I should make some sizing plates and arrange my roller to bump.
http://www.vk2zay.net/
#17
Posted 01 March 2004 - 08:52 PM
#18
Posted 02 March 2004 - 05:51 PM
What size do i need 2oz 4oz 8oz 1 lb Rocket?Also What size Stinger 1,2 or 3 Lb?.
Any suggestions ...
What does the Term 2 oz ,4 oz ,1lb mean ?
Cheers
sasman
#19
Posted 02 March 2004 - 05:56 PM
Obviously, the size of payload dictates the size of motor tooling. I'm sure Rich will be able to give you some good advice.
#20
Posted 02 March 2004 - 10:28 PM
name ID
2 oz 3/8"
4 oz 1/2"
8 oz 5/8"
1 lb 3/4"
2 lb 7/8"
3 lb 1"
4 lb 1 1/4"
6 lb 1 1/2"
A "1 lb" stinger motor is 3/4" (or 19 mm) ID, and 2 1/2" - 3" long, it weighs a bit less than 50 g once charged, about 18-20 g of propellant the rest is the casing and nozzle, etc. A conventional core burning BP "1 lb" rocket is 7 1/2" long and weighs a whole lot less than 1 lb.
The 4 oz rocket is a good size for lifting reasonable payloads, it is also the ideal starting size for saxons, drivers and tourbillion devices. The standard casings are usually 10 times their ID in length, or 5" for a 1/2" ID tube.
http://www.vk2zay.net/
#21
Posted 02 March 2004 - 10:33 PM
#22
Posted 03 March 2004 - 12:24 PM
The weight refers to the mass of a lead ball that fits the ID (or is it OD, I can't rememeber?) of the rocket motor casing
It is the mass of a lead ball that fits the bore of the "sleeve" or casing, into which the rocket cases were placed to stop the rocket cases from bursting during manufacture - so it would be the OD.
These sleeves or casings were used in the original military manufacture of BP rockets, when the case was rammed solid (ie no central core) then an awl was forced into the grain to create the core.
This military manufacture explains why this naming system came about. The military used the same method to categorize cannons - ie a 2 pounder cannon had a bore, that a 2lb sphere of lead would fit!
#23
Posted 03 March 2004 - 09:14 PM
#24
Posted 17 March 2004 - 11:27 PM
Just to confuse things further, The American system takes a lead ball that fits the ID of the case, whilst the British system takes a lead ball that fits the ramming sleeve as in Rip Rap's description. I'd rather have a British 1lb rocket than an American one as it's considerably bigger
Surely their 1Lb'er is larger if they measure the ID and we measure the OD.
#25
Posted 21 June 2004 - 09:34 AM
http://www.chronos.l...2_2e#aSDY032_2e ?
Which one of them do i buy for punching plates?
#26
Posted 21 June 2004 - 10:10 AM
#27
Posted 22 June 2004 - 03:22 PM
His 1st reply was:
The 1 # bp rocket kit would be $90.00 us , and the stinger would be $50.00 . Carriage included . It's only about $5.00 to post them.
Greg
Which I thought was a bit odd since carriage to the UK is obviously more than that .
I'd also seen the price of $60 and mentioned it.
2nd reply was:
Paypal to pyrofx is fine .
I didn't know that that old page was still there . I'll honor the 60 price and 5 to post it .
Greg
Maybe I'm worrying for nothing and was hoping any of you guys could put my mind to rest, but the outcome was that I sent $120 for both sets inc P&P.(12 days ago)
The 3rd reply was:
just in time , I'm off to the post office now . Air mail 4-7 days . Inbound from Dorset has been taking around 5 days.
Greg
He seems to be a regular poster on rec pyro. I guess I should have done my research before hand. I wouldn't like to slag the guy off if he's completely genuine
but have had a bad feeling all the way over this.
Is it early days for airmail? or am I onto a looser here? Also the paypay account had been set up a couple of years ago and had only had one transaction pass through it in all that time!!!
Thanks
Maxman
#28
Posted 24 June 2004 - 08:02 AM
I just panicked, but trust a true pyro not to let you down.
So if anyone is interested the above site is highly recommended and airmail is taking about two weeks at the moment.
Now down to business!
#29
Posted 25 June 2004 - 08:30 AM
See how long this takes
Nick
Edited by nickpatts, 25 June 2004 - 08:31 AM.
#30
Posted 25 June 2004 - 10:18 AM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users