Melting chemicals. Which is the safest method
#1
Posted 21 April 2004 - 02:34 AM
From what i've read so far I think maybe a cheap gas stove would be best but it's more the matter of monitoring the temperature so I can make sure it's only enough to melt and not ignite.
Thanks very much!
Pritch
#2
Posted 21 April 2004 - 06:25 AM
Edited by Stuart, 21 April 2004 - 04:36 PM.
#3
Posted 21 April 2004 - 09:43 PM
As for portable gas stoves, many people use them, but I'd feel safer with an electric. A lot of this is just psycological I suppose, a red hot element isn't much slower than a flame for lighting spilled powder (not that any of us ever spill things), but still, why add propane or natural gas to the mix?
From my reading, I'd estimate that melt casting probably improves performance 10-15% over well mixed rammed powder. I considered the increased risk, and the effort/mess, and decided it wasn't worth the mess Not yet anyway, I'm sure I'll try it sooner or later. Let me know how it works out either way you go. You seem to be one of few others doing rockets at present.
Remember, ignitability increases with temperature. Be careful, as always.
[EDIT/ADD ON: The fryers are often used as a double boiler with Crisco (shortening) or something similar that will harden between uses for easy storage.]
Edited by chim-chim, 22 April 2004 - 05:00 PM.
It's gonna take a lot of fireworks to clean this place up.
-Homer Simpson
#4
Posted 22 April 2004 - 03:42 PM
Edited by Demented Ferret, 22 April 2004 - 03:43 PM.
#5
Posted 22 April 2004 - 04:56 PM
It's gonna take a lot of fireworks to clean this place up.
-Homer Simpson
#6
Posted 22 April 2004 - 07:52 PM
#7
Posted 23 April 2004 - 11:23 PM
#8
Posted 24 April 2004 - 02:13 AM
Just keep it moving and you will be just fine
-Matt
#9
Posted 24 April 2004 - 09:03 AM
U do not melt over direct open fire, stiring or not, you do not do it. Please visit Richard Nakka site for safety issues and the two possible ways of doing it correctly.One rule, keep stirring. I cook this stuff over a bloody fire no temp control whatsoever. I have had 2 batches go up as they were my first. If there is any on the walls of the pan darkening, scrape it off and strir it around.
Just keep it moving and you will be just fine
-Matt
#10
Posted 24 April 2004 - 09:05 AM
#11
Posted 24 April 2004 - 01:44 PM
#12
Posted 25 April 2004 - 01:30 AM
It isnt on a direct flame as such, we put a 3mm steel plate on a grid above the flame, I suppose it still heats up more in some spots but the pan I use is kinda small so the general heat is ok, but I tell ya stirring reduces risk of going up due to hot spots! ya just gotta beleive me!
-Matt
#13
Posted 25 April 2004 - 08:39 AM
Matt, It still does not matter. What you suggest is putting a naked flame in a close proximity to a pyrotechnic composition. This is not safe. It does not matter how much inches of plate you got between the two. Let say that because of some silly breeze the flame escape from under the plate and touch the upper side of your pan? It does not matter how much unlikely it is, you don?t take the chance.I really dont like trying to justify myself but... here I go.
It isnt on a direct flame as such, we put a 3mm steel plate on a grid above the flame, I suppose it still heats up more in some spots but the pan I use is kinda small so the general heat is ok, but I tell ya stirring reduces risk of going up due to hot spots! ya just gotta beleive me!
-Matt
Electric or Enclosed flame (such device does exists), or hot oil are still safer by far, (although 100% safe does not really exists).
I understand some members consider naked flame on small quantities with good personal understanding of what you are doing represent small danger ? but they should not advise is to others who might not understand the level of procedural safety required.
#14
Posted 26 April 2004 - 02:43 AM
Back to the melting......
-Matt
#15
Posted 26 April 2004 - 08:01 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users