My respect for flash, like many other people, also came from a bit of a surprise. 2g's must have been scary, I was using maybe .2-.3g of 70/30 left over from doing a few .5g rocket reports. I rolled it quite loosely in about a 3" piece of rice paper expecting a bright burning quick match effect. You guessed it, BANG! Not much more than a firecracker, but a lot more than fuse for sure. I wouldn't have considered two loose wraps of rice paper containment for a weakened housefly, but that flash sure snapped.
Be careful everyone.
- UK Pyrotechnics Society Forums
- → Viewing Profile: Posts: chim-chim
Community Stats
- Group General Public Members
- Active Posts 61
- Profile Views 5,276
- Member Title Member
- Age 53 years old
- Birthday November 29, 1970
-
Gender
Not Telling
-
Location
Northern California, U.S.
-
Interests
Pyrotechnics obviously, but I pick up about 2 hobbies a year and drift in and out of them from year to year. Model rocketry, Computers, Mountain Biking, Gardening and Herbs and Role Playing Games have surfaced in the past year or so.<br>
0
Neutral
User Tools
Posts I've Made
In Topic: Big Bang surprise?
20 September 2004 - 05:01 PM
In Topic: How Old Are You
25 August 2004 - 09:47 PM
Now I feel old.
Thanks Stuart.
Thanks Stuart.
In Topic: Strange Nitrates
17 August 2004 - 08:23 PM
As a general rule, if an ingredient used in an older formula isn't used much anymore, I figure there's probably a reason , legal if nothing else.
I'm curious as well,
but remember to take additional precautions and extra care (i.e.-lots of research, which is what you're starting now I guess) working with archaic formulas.
I'm curious as well,
but remember to take additional precautions and extra care (i.e.-lots of research, which is what you're starting now I guess) working with archaic formulas.
In Topic: smoke bombs idea
05 August 2004 - 06:58 PM
I've considered salvaging the pull string charges out of confetti poppers and mounting them in a small spolette of delay to ignite mine. Same Idea as ordering from Firefox I suppose but less wait and hassle.
In Topic: Colour changing stars
30 July 2004 - 05:44 PM
As a general tip, consider brillance and saturation as well as color.
Assuming your blues are less bright and saturated than your greens, which are brighter but less saturated than your purples which are as bright but not a saturated as your reds, or some such order. You are going to want to consider the order as well the combination. I'd love to do a star that went Red/White/Blue, but noone would be able to see the blue after the bright red has them seeing a green after image and the white has desensatized thier vision . Whereas Blue/Red/White would be distinguishable and get progressivly brighter.
This site has some great colorwheels and quick explanations but keep in mind they're talking pigment, not light (mix green and orange light get yellow, mix green and orange paint, get brown, lights an additive process, pigments are subtractive)
Assuming your blues are less bright and saturated than your greens, which are brighter but less saturated than your purples which are as bright but not a saturated as your reds, or some such order. You are going to want to consider the order as well the combination. I'd love to do a star that went Red/White/Blue, but noone would be able to see the blue after the bright red has them seeing a green after image and the white has desensatized thier vision . Whereas Blue/Red/White would be distinguishable and get progressivly brighter.
This site has some great colorwheels and quick explanations but keep in mind they're talking pigment, not light (mix green and orange light get yellow, mix green and orange paint, get brown, lights an additive process, pigments are subtractive)
- UK Pyrotechnics Society Forums
- → Viewing Profile: Posts: chim-chim
- Privacy Policy
- Forum rules ·