Perhaps in order to ascertain what constitutes adequate training for Cat.4 these idiot legislators ought to consult the people who insure professional pyrotechnicians - after all they will base cover/premiums on perceived risk relating to an operator and its employees based on the standard of training received.
A National firework school sounds an interesting concept.
TC
- UK Pyrotechnics Society Forums
- → Viewing Profile: Posts: TCblastmaster
Community Stats
- Group General Public Members
- Active Posts 43
- Profile Views 5,200
- Member Title Member
- Age 61 years old
- Birthday November 18, 1963
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Suffolk
-
Interests
Music-I am a bit of an audiophile.
Performance cars. Quite remarkably I still have a clean license!
Working with precious metals and gem stones.
DIY projects, out of necessity!
Oh, I also make fireworks.
0
Neutral
User Tools
Posts I've Made
In Topic: EU pyrotechnics directive call for comment
13 September 2009 - 05:26 PM
In Topic: Pyro for a day
13 September 2009 - 04:59 PM
An enjoyable and interesting series of videos, particularly because it was a small show and something most of us can relate to.
They were very close to the pond though!
TC
They were very close to the pond though!
TC
In Topic: Display Music Poll
11 September 2009 - 09:06 PM
If you are going to play music during a show I think you have to do something constructive with it. In my opinion it is either superfluous to it (or even a distraction) or something that becomes an integral and seamless part of it. The latter requires precise timing, something beyond most of us I would imagine (and most of the big display companies from what I've seen anyway).
However, if a track is played as a prelude I think it can work well to set the mood and tempo for a show.
Other than that why complicate things, let the fireworks do the talking. After all they are an art form in themselves that provide their own voices.
TC
However, if a track is played as a prelude I think it can work well to set the mood and tempo for a show.
Other than that why complicate things, let the fireworks do the talking. After all they are an art form in themselves that provide their own voices.
TC
In Topic: my bp's working
08 September 2009 - 07:04 PM
I have had some very good results with the CIA method but usually ball mill the C and S beforehand- otherwise you get solid lumps of sulphur in the finished product. However, using the CIA method and then ball milling the dried granules produces a much faster powder. Never compared it to the purely ball milled variety because one tends to stick with what has previously worked well.
In my experience the effectiveness of the CIA method depends on a number of things; ensuring that just enough water is present to keep all the KNO3 in solution prior to adding the alcohol - difficult when so much of the water evaporates during heating large batches safely and a large proportion may no longer be in solution (showing up as large crystals on drying and poor performance)and adding the correct amount of chilled alcohol to rapidly and completely precipitate the KNO3 -some of which could be lost when wringing out the ball of BP if too much water has been added or too little alcohol. Clearly the proportions of chemicals in the composition can change in many ways. Get it spot on and you'll have good lift powder with rather delicate grains (when grated through a screen). I have also found the lift made by this method to be very hygroscopic- what starts off as brilliant lift can be rendered useless by atmospheric moisture- purely anecdotal but I have experienced it, much to my embarrassment.
Ball milling is therefore essential, whatever method you use. Producing excellent BP is the Holy Grail of pyro and often a closely guarded secret.
TC
In my experience the effectiveness of the CIA method depends on a number of things; ensuring that just enough water is present to keep all the KNO3 in solution prior to adding the alcohol - difficult when so much of the water evaporates during heating large batches safely and a large proportion may no longer be in solution (showing up as large crystals on drying and poor performance)and adding the correct amount of chilled alcohol to rapidly and completely precipitate the KNO3 -some of which could be lost when wringing out the ball of BP if too much water has been added or too little alcohol. Clearly the proportions of chemicals in the composition can change in many ways. Get it spot on and you'll have good lift powder with rather delicate grains (when grated through a screen). I have also found the lift made by this method to be very hygroscopic- what starts off as brilliant lift can be rendered useless by atmospheric moisture- purely anecdotal but I have experienced it, much to my embarrassment.
Ball milling is therefore essential, whatever method you use. Producing excellent BP is the Holy Grail of pyro and often a closely guarded secret.
TC
In Topic: my bp's working
08 September 2009 - 07:03 PM
I have had some very good results with the CIA method but usually ball mill the C and S beforehand- otherwise you get solid lumps of sulphur in the finished product. However, using the CIA method and then ball milling the dried granules produces a much faster powder. Never compared it to the purely ball milled variety because one tends to stick with what has previously worked well.
In my experience the effectiveness of the CIA method depends on a number of things; ensuring that just enough water is present to keep all the KNO3 in solution prior to adding the alcohol - difficult when so much of the water evaporates during heating large batches safely and a large proportion may no longer be in solution (showing up as large crystals on drying and poor performance)and adding the correct amount of chilled alcohol to rapidly and completely precipitate the KNO3 -some of which could be lost when wringing out the ball of BP if too much water has been added or too little alcohol. Clearly the proportions of chemicals in the composition can change in many ways. Get it spot on and you'll have good lift powder with rather delicate grains (when grated through a screen). I have also found the lift made by this method to be very hygroscopic- what starts off as brilliant lift can be rendered useless by atmospheric moisture- purely anecdotal but I have experienced it, much to my embarrassment.
Ball milling is therefore essential, whatever method you use. Producing excellent BP is the Holy Grail of pyro and often a closely guarded secret.
TC
In my experience the effectiveness of the CIA method depends on a number of things; ensuring that just enough water is present to keep all the KNO3 in solution prior to adding the alcohol - difficult when so much of the water evaporates during heating large batches safely and a large proportion may no longer be in solution (showing up as large crystals on drying and poor performance)and adding the correct amount of chilled alcohol to rapidly and completely precipitate the KNO3 -some of which could be lost when wringing out the ball of BP if too much water has been added or too little alcohol. Clearly the proportions of chemicals in the composition can change in many ways. Get it spot on and you'll have good lift powder with rather delicate grains (when grated through a screen). I have also found the lift made by this method to be very hygroscopic- what starts off as brilliant lift can be rendered useless by atmospheric moisture- purely anecdotal but I have experienced it, much to my embarrassment.
Ball milling is therefore essential, whatever method you use. Producing excellent BP is the Holy Grail of pyro and often a closely guarded secret.
TC
- UK Pyrotechnics Society Forums
- → Viewing Profile: Posts: TCblastmaster
- Privacy Policy
- Forum rules ·